Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
[2025:RJ-JP:48341] HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR S.B. Civil Writ Petition No. 16768/2025
1. Jai Singh S/o Shri Suwa Ram, Aged About 47 Years, R/o Newari Via - Ponkh, Teshil Udaipurwati, District - Jhunjhunu (Rajasthan) Belt No. Ct Driver -933
2. Manohar Lal S/o Shri Malla Ram, R/o Newari, Via - Ponkh, Tehsil - Udiapurwati, District Jhunjhunu (Rajasthan) Belt No. 861.
3. Dinesh Chand S/o Shri Durga Prasad, Aged About 52 Years, R/o Village Kandhori, District Bharatpur (Rajasthan) Belt No. 921 ----Petitioners Versus
1. State Of Rajasthan, Through Its Home Secretary, Secretariat, Jaipur (Rajasthan)
2. Director General Of Police, Rajasthan, Jaipur (Raj.)
3. Additional Director General Of Police (Railway), Police Head Quarter Lalkothi, Jaipur (Rajasthan)
4. Superintendent Of Police, Grp Ajmer (Rajasthan) ----Respondents For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Sandeep Garssa For Respondent(s) :
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ASHOK KUMAR JAIN
Order 24/11/2025
1. Instant writ petition is preferred by petitioners with following prayer:
“It is ,therefore, most humbly prayed that your Lordships may kindly be pleased to call for the entire record relating to the case, examine the same and accept and allow
this
writ
petition, and- (I) by appropriate writ order or direction in the nature thereof and thereby direct
[2025:RJ-JP:48341] (2 of 3) [CW-16768/2025] the respondents to grant notional benefit to the petitioners from the date of first appointment date of the selected candidate till the date of joining of petitioner. (ii) Issue an appropriate writ order or direction in the nature thereof thereby direct the respondents to grant the benefit of First ACP, as granted to the selected candidates appointment prior to the petitioner, which were selected in the same selection process. (iii) Issue and appropriate writ order or direction
in
the
nature thereof thereby direct the respondents to grant increment to the petitioner equal to the persons, which were given appointment prior to the petitioners, who were selected in the same selection process. (iv) Issue an appropriate writ order or direction in the nature thereof thereby direct the respondents to make fixations of the petitioners equal to the persons selected in the same selection process but given joining prior to the petitioners. (V) Any other appropriate writ, order, or direction
which
this Hon'ble Court may deem fit and proper in the
facts
and circumstances of the case may also be passed
in
favour of the petitioner along with costs of the writ petition. (vi) Cost of the writ petition be also be awarded in favour of the petitioners. ”
2.
Learned counsel for petitioners while referring and relying upon judgment dated 29.08.2023 in S.B. Civil Writ Petition No.12619/2023 “Rajuram & Ors. Vs. State of Rajasthan & Ors.” submits that the controversy and the issue raised herein is already settled by a Co-ordinate Bench of this Hon’ble Court. He further submitted that instant writ petition be disposed of in accordance with aforesaid order.
[2025:RJ-JP:48341] (3 of 3) [CW-16768/2025]
3. Having considered the submissions of learned counsel for petitioners and also material placed on record, the writ petition is liable for disposal in light of Rajuram (supra) and Bhawani Singh Vs. State of Rajasthan & Ors.:S.B. Civil Writ Petition No. 6447/2019, decided on 15.01.2021 passed by this Court.
4. Considered the grievance raised herein, the petitioners are given a liberty to submit a representation to the respondents- Authority within a period of 30 days raising all grounds and the respondents-Authority are directed to decide the representation in light of ratio laid down in case referred hereinabove, but in case of deviation, with a reasoned and speaking order within a period of 30 days from date of receipt of representation. After the decision, the respondents are under an obligation to communicate the decision to the petitioners either by way of speed post or through E-mail, if petitioner have provided E-mail in their representation. If the petitioners are still aggrieved, they have a liberty to approach this Court with fresh petition.
5. With the aforesaid directions, the present writ petition with pending application, if any, stands disposed of.
(ASHOK KUMAR JAIN),J CHETNA BEHRANI /189