THANDIRAM S/O SHRI MUKANDIRAM v. STATE OF RAJASTHAN
CRLMB/14234/2025 · 2025-11-27
Sameer Jain
body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 45699 (RAJ) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 45699 (RAJ) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
[2025:RJ-JP:48220] HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR S.B. Criminal Miscellaneous Bail Application No. 14234/2025 Thandiram S/o Shri Mukandiram, Aged About 61 Years, R/o Jaul, Tehsil Todabhim, District Karauli. (At Present Confined In Sub Jail Hindaun City). ----Applicant Versus State Of Rajasthan, Through Pp ----Respondent For Applicant(s) : Mr. R.S. Bhardwaj For Respondent(s) : Mr. Rhishi Raj Singh Rathore, PP Ms. Arti Sharma, PP HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SAMEER JAIN
Order 27/11/2025
1. The instant bail application has been filed under Section 483 BNSS on behalf of accused-applicant. The accused-applicant was arrested in connection with FIR No. 155/2025 registered at Police Station Todabhim District Karauli for the offence(s) under Sections 115(2), 126(2) & 3(5) of BNS, 2023.
2.
Learned counsel for the accused-applicant submits that the applicant is senior citizen, aged about 61 years, having no criminal antecedents. It is further submitted that the applicant is in custody since 14.10.2025. It is also submitted that in the instant matter, a financial transaction amounting to the tune of approximately ₹30,000/- is in dispute and the specific allegations regarding the same were levelled against the co-accused, namely Dipak. Withal, allegations under Section 110 BNS were also leveled.
[2025:RJ-JP:48220] (2 of 2) [CRLMB-14234/2025]
3. Per contra, learned Public Prosecutor has vehemently opposed the instant bail application.
4. Having heard the arguments advanced by the learned counsel for the parties and taking note of the fact that the applicant is senior citizen, aged about 61 years; that there are no criminal antecedents against the applicant; that the applicant is in custody since 14.10.2025; that the specific allegations were attributed to the co-accused, namely Dipak, and looking to the overall facts and circumstances of the case and material on record but without commenting on merits/demerits of the case, this court is inclined to allow the instant bail application of the accused- applicant and enlarge him on bail.
5. Accordingly, the bail application under Section 483 BNSS is allowed and it is ordered that accused-applicant Thandiram S/o Shri Mukandiram shall be enlarged on bail provided he furnishes a personal bond of Rs.50,000/- with two sureties of Rs.25,000/- each to the satisfaction of learned Trial Judge for his appearance before the court concerned on all the dates of hearing as and when called upon to do so.
(SAMEER JAIN),J JKP/138