Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Andhra Pradesh · body

2025 DAILYLAW 45698 (AP)

SRI MARUTHI CONSTRUCTIONS v. The State of Andhra Pradesh,

WP/30065/2021 · 2025-09-21

V Sujatha

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

APHC010495132021 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH MONDAY, THE TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE THE HONOURABLE SMT JUSTICE V.SUJATHA WRIT PETITION NO: 30065/2021 Between: 1. SRI MARUTHI CONSTRUCTIONS, D.NO. 6 EAST GODAVARI DISTRICT REP BY ITS MANAGING PARTNER KARRI TATA REDDY. 1. THE STATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH, REP. BY ITS PRINCIPAL SECRETARY, WATER RESOURCES DEPARTMENT, ANDHRA PRADESH, VELAGAPUDI, GUNTUR DISTRICT. 2. THE SUPERINTENDING ENGINEER, IRRIGATION CIRCLE, DOWLAISWARAM, 'E.G. DISTRICT. 3. THE EXECUTIVE ENGINEER, GODAVARI CENTRAL DIVISION, AMALAPURAM, E.G. DISTRICT. 4. THE EXECUTIVE ENGINEER, QUA DOWLAISWARAM, E.G. DISTRICT. 5. THE REGIONAL VIGILANCE AND ENFORCEMENT OFFICER, RAJAMAHENDRAVARAM, E.G. DISTRICT. Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased toto issue an appropriate Writ, Order or direction more particularly one in the nature of Writ of Mandamus declaring the proceedings in letter No. IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) THE TWENTY SECOND DAY OF SEPTEMBER TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SMT JUSTICE V.SUJATHA WRIT PETITION NO: 30065/2021 SRI MARUTHI CONSTRUCTIONS, D.NO. 6-150, RAVULAPALEM, EAST GODAVARI DISTRICT REP BY ITS MANAGING PARTNER KARRI TATA REDDY. ...PETITIONER AND THE STATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH, REP. BY ITS PRINCIPAL SECRETARY, WATER RESOURCES DEPARTMENT, SECRETARIAT, ANDHRA PRADESH, VELAGAPUDI, GUNTUR DISTRICT. THE SUPERINTENDING ENGINEER, IRRIGATION CIRCLE, DOWLAISWARAM, 'E.G. DISTRICT. THE EXECUTIVE ENGINEER, GODAVARI CENTRAL DIVISION, AMALAPURAM, E.G. DISTRICT. THE EXECUTIVE ENGINEER, QUALITY CONTROL DIVISION, DOWLAISWARAM, E.G. DISTRICT. THE REGIONAL VIGILANCE AND ENFORCEMENT OFFICER, RAJAMAHENDRAVARAM, E.G. DISTRICT. ...RESPONDENT(S): Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying that in the in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased toto issue an appropriate Writ, Order or direction more particularly one in the nature of Writ of Mandamus declaring the proceedings in letter No. IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH [3333] TWENTY SECOND DAY OF SEPTEMBER THE HONOURABLE SMT JUSTICE V.SUJATHA 150, RAVULAPALEM, EAST GODAVARI DISTRICT REP BY ITS MANAGING PARTNER ...PETITIONER THE STATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH, REP. BY ITS PRINCIPAL SECRETARIAT, ANDHRA PRADESH, VELAGAPUDI, GUNTUR DISTRICT. THE SUPERINTENDING ENGINEER, IRRIGATION CIRCLE, THE EXECUTIVE ENGINEER, GODAVARI CENTRAL DIVISION, LITY CONTROL DIVISION, THE REGIONAL VIGILANCE AND ENFORCEMENT OFFICER, ...RESPONDENT(S): Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying that in the in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased toto issue an appropriate Writ, Order or direction more particularly one in the nature of Writ of Mandamus declaring the proceedings in letter No. 2 VS,J W.P.No.30065 of 2021 DB/ATO/844M, Dt. 01.12.2021 issued by the respondent No.3 issued on the basis of the report issued in report No. 10 (C.No. 4916N andEi En 2019) Dated. 04-09-2020 of the respondent No.5 as arbitrary, illegal, violative of the principles of natural justice and well established legal principles apart form being violative of the constitutional rights guaranteed to the petitioner under Article 14, 19 and 21 of the constitution of India and consequently set aside the proceedings in letter No. DB/ATO/844M, Dt. 01.12.2021 issued by the respondent No.3 and the report in No.10 (C.No.4916/V and E/Engg/2019) dated 04.09.2020 of the respondent No.5 and pass. IA NO: 1 OF 2021 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased pleased to grant stay of all further proceedings in pursuance of the proceedings in letter No. DB/ATO/844M Dt. 1.12.2021 issued by the respondent No.3 issued on the basis of the report issued in report No. 10 (C.No. 4916N&E/Engg/2019) Dated: 04-09-2020 by the respondent No.5 and pass IA NO: 1 OF 2022 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased pleased to vacate the interim order dt:09- 03-2022 passed in W.P.No.30065 of 2021, and dismiss the present Writ Petition with costs and pass Counsel for the Petitioner: 1. SOURI BABU DUPPATI Counsel for the Respondent(S): 1. GP FOR HOME (AP) 2. GP FOR IRRIGATION COMM AREA DEV 3 VS,J W.P.No.30065 of 2021 The Court made the following Order: Mr. Souri Babu Duppati, learned counsel for the petitioner stated that the cause in the writ petition does not survive and the matter has become infructuous. 2. Recording the above submission, the Writ Petition is dismissed as infructuous. There shall be no order as to costs. As a sequel, Interlocutory Applications pending, if any, shall stand closed. __________________ JUSTICE V.SUJATHA Dated: 22.09.2025 MDP