HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD PUBLIC INTEREST LITIGATION (PIL) No. - 7649 of 2011 Court No. - 29 HON'BLE MAHESH CHANDRA TRIPATHI, J. HON'BLE ANISH KUMAR GUPTA, J. 1. The matter was taken up in the revised list. However, none appeared on behalf of the petitioners to press the petition, nor has any adjournment slip been moved. Learned counsel for the respondents is present. 2. In the absence of any effective representation, it appears that the cause of action has become stale and the writ petition has been rendered infructuous by efflux of time. 3. Accordingly, the writ petition is dismissed as infructuous. Interim order, if any, stands vacated. 4. In case the petitioners feel that the matter still survives, liberty is granted them to move an application for recalling this order within six weeks from today. September 10, 2025 NLY Versus Counsel for Petitioner(s) : K.K. Roy, Kamal Nayan, Rajeev Kumar Singh Counsel for Respondent(s) : A.S.G.I. (2011/268), Shailendra Garg (Anish Kumar Gupta,J.) (Mahesh Chandra Tripathi,J.) Quality Institutional Care And Alternative For Children And Anr. .....Petitioner(s) Union Of India And Others .....Respondent(s) Digitally signed by :- NAND LAL YADAV High Court of Judicature at Allahabad