[2025:RJ-JP:47486] HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR S.B. Civil Writ Petition No. 18051/2025 Babita Parihar D/o Jairam Parihar, Aged About 26 Years, R/o 1/130, Jai Narayan Vyas Colony, Nagaur, Rajasthan. ----Petitioner Versus Rajasthan Public Service Commission, Ajmer Through Its Secretary. ----Respondent For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Ram Pratap Saini For Respondent(s) : Mr. Govind Gupta for Mr. M.F. Baig HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ASHOK KUMAR JAIN Order 24/11/2025 1. Instant writ petition is filed with following prayers:- i. By an appropriate writ, order or direction in the nature thereof, the respondent RPSC be directed to declare the result of petitioner for the post of Assistant Professor (History), which was illegally and on wrong presumption kept in a sealed cover as per result dated 19.03.2025. ii. Issue an appropriate writ order or direction in the nature thereof thereby, the respondent RPSC be directed that if petitioner declared successful in the written examination, then she may be allowed to appear in the interview for the post of Assistant Professor (History) and her final result be declared. iii. Pass any other appropriate order which this Hon’ble Court may deem fit, just and proper in the facts and circumstances of the case in favour of the petitioner. iv. Cost of the writ petition be also awarded in favour of the petitioner. [2025:RJ-JP:47486] (2 of 3) [CW-18051/2025] 2. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that to change the subject category the petitioner has filed a writ petition No.7695/2024 and same was allowed by this Hon’ble Court on 15.05.2024, wherein the petitioner was permitted to change the subject category. He further submits that on the basis of change in subject category, the petitioner has appeared in written examination, organized in pursuant to recruitment advertisement dated 22.06.2023 but the result notification dated 19.03.2025 indicate that result of the petitioner was kept in sealed cover. He also submits that in the order dated 15.05.2024 nowhere, mentioned that the result of the petitioner was kept in a sealed cover. 3. Having considered aforesaid, issue notice to respondent. 4. Mr. Govind Gupta on behalf of Mr. M.F. Baig accepts notice on behalf of respondent-RPSC. 5. Office is directed to reflect the name of Mr. M.F. Baig as counsel for respondent. 6. Learned counsel for the petitioner is directed to supply copy of the petition to Mr. M.F. Baig. 7. Considering the submissions, it is appropriate to dispose of this writ petition at this stage only. 8. While allowing Writ Petition No.7695/2024 on 15.05.2024, the Co-ordinate Bench of this Court, placing reliance upon order in case of Sh rawan Kumar Khokhar Versus R ajasthan Public Service Commission (S.B. Civil Writ Petition No.2754/2024) has permitted change of subject category and thereafter the petitioner has appeared in the examination for the changed subject. [2025:RJ-JP:47486] (3 of 3) [CW-18051/2025] 9. There was no direction in order dated 15.05.2024 to withhold the result of the petitioner or kept it in a sealed cover. The result notification indicate that due to pendency of certain petitions, therefore, result of 61 candidates has put in a sealed cover, including as that of petitioner. The result of the petitioner was neither kept in a sealed cover nor withhold by this Court. Therefore, the RPSC is under an obligation to declare the result of the petitioner. 10. Accordingly, the writ petition is allowed and the respondent is directed to declare the result within a period of seven days from the date of receipt of copy of this order. 11. With the aforesaid, the writ petition and miscellaneous application, if any, stands disposed of. (ASHOK KUMAR JAIN),J Chandan/147