1 2025:CGHC:4350-DB NAFR HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR REVP No. 3 of 2025 1 - Khalsa Beverages (India) Address- 104 And 105, Sector A, Industrial Area, Sirgitti, Bilaspur (C.G.), Through- The Proprietor Jagpal Singh Khanuja S/o Sardar Charanjeet Singh Khanuja Aged About 35 Years, Address- 104 And 105, Sector A, Industrial Area, Sirgitti, Bilaspur, Chhattisgarh ... Applicant versus 1 - State Of Chhattisgarh Through- Secretary, Water Resources Department, Mantralaya, Mahanadi Bhawan, Raipur, Chhattisgarh 2 - The Executive Engineer Kharan Division, Water Resources Department, Bilaspur (Chhattisgarh) 3 - Union Of India Through- Central Ground Water Authority, Ministry Of Water Resources, Government Of India, West Block-2, Wing-3, Sector-1, R.K. Puram, New Delhi- 110066 4 - Central Ground Water Board Regional Office, North Central Chhattisgarh, 2nd Floor, L K Corporate And Logistic Park, Dhamtari Road, Nh-30 Dumartarari Raipur (C.G.) 492015 ... Respondents --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- For Applicant : None present. For Respondents No. 1 & 2 : Mr. Sangharsh Pandey, Govt. Advocate. For Respondents No. 3 & 4 / : Mr. Ramakant Mishra, Dy. Solicitor General Union of India -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- 2 Hon'ble Shri Ramesh Sinha, Chief Justice and Hon'ble Shri Naresh Kumar Chandravanshi, Judge Order on Board Per Ramesh Sinha , Chief Justice 24.01.2025 The present review petition has been filed by the applicant seeking following reliefs : - “It is, therefore, prayed that Hon’ble High Court may be pleased to reconsider and revisit the order dated 19/07/2024 and allow the review petition and reinstate WPC 679 of 2024 for a comprehensive hearing on its merits and grant any other relief that this Hon’ble High Court deems fit and proper in the interests of justice. ” 2. Despite repeated calls neither applicant appeared nor represented by any counsel to press this review petition. 3. The present review petition is also barred by limitation. 4. It seems that the applicant has lost interest in pursuing the matter. 5. Accordingly, the instant review petition is dismissed for want of prosecution. 6. Pending Interlocutory application (s), if any, stands disposed of. Sd/- Sd/- (Naresh Kumar Chandravanshi) (Ramesh Sinha) Judge Chief Justice Dubey AMIT KUMAR DUBEY Digitally signed by AMIT KUMAR DUBEY Date: 2025.01.25 12:14:45 +0530 3