Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
HIGH COURT OF UTTARAKHAND AT NAINITAL
Second Bail Application No.65 of 2025
Suraj Pal
….....Applicant
Versus
State of Uttarakhand
….….Respondent
Present:-
Mr. Shakti Singh, Advocate for the applicant through video conferencing. Ms. Manisha Rana Singh, D.A.G. for the State.
Hon’ble Ravindra Maithani, J. (Oral)
Applicant is in judicial custody in Sessions Trial No. 19 of 2023, State Vs. Suraj Pal, pending in the court of Sessions Judge, Champawat, which is based on Case Crime No. 99 of 2023, under Section 376 (2) (f), 376 (n), 352, 342, 354C IPC and Section 66E of the Information Technology Act, 2000, Police Station Banbasa, Districgt Champawat. He has sought his release on bail. This is second bail application of the applicant. His first bail application was dismissed on merits on
31.07.2024.
2.
Heard learned counsel for the parties and perused the record.
2
3.
Having considered, this Court is of the view that there is no new ground to enlarge the applicant on bail. Accordingly, the second bail application of the applicant deserves to be rejected.
4.
The second bail application is rejected.
(Ravindra Maithani, J.)
24.04.2025 Jitendra