PENDYALA SREENIVASULU v. THE STATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH
WP/12051/2023 · 2025-09-22
Tarlada Rajasekhar Rao
body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 45677 (AP) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 45677 (AP) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
APHC010226712023
IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3330] TUESDAY,THE TWENTY THIRD DAY OF SEPTEMBER TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE
PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE TARLADA RAJASEKHAR RAO WRIT PETITION No. 12051/2023 BETWEEN:
1. PENDYALA SREENIVASULU, S/o. VENKATA RAMUDU, AGED ABOUT YEARS,EX. ARMY SERVICE MAN, NO. 14818996 TAGOR NAGAR, H.NO.50/754, KURNOOL, KURNOOL DISTRICT
...PETITIONER AND
1. THE STATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH, REP. BY ITS PRINCIPLE SECRETARY REVENUE DEPARTMENT, A.P. SECRETARIAT, VELAGAPUDI , GUNTUR DIST. AMARAVATHI
2. THE DISTRICT COLLECTOR, KURNOOL DISTRICT
3. THE REVENUE DIVISIONAL OFFICER, KURNOOL TOWN, KURNOOL DISTRICT
4. THE TAHSILDAR, ORVAKAL MANDAL, KURNOOL DISTRICT
...RESPONDENT(S): Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased to issue writ , order or direction more particularly one in the nature of WRIRT OF MANDAMUS declaring the action of the 4th respondent in issuing the endorsement stating that the land of the petitioner Ac.5-00 cents in S.No.548 B in Kalva Village is government land and he is not in possession without verifying the revenue records which are revealing that the petitioner is having right,
2 possession and enjoyment of the Ac.5-00 cents in S.No.548 B in Kalva Village , Orvakal Mlandal, Kurnool District and the inaction of the 2nd respondent on the representation dated 16-03-2023 is illegal, arbitrary, without jurisdiction, contrary to the provisions of A.P. Rights in Land and Pattadar Pass Book Act 1971, against the existing laws apart from violation of Articles 14,19,21 and 301 of Constitution of India and pass
IA NO: 1 OF 2023
Counsel for the Petitioner:
1. DR G V RAVI Counsel for the Respondent(S):
1. GP FOR REVENUE The Court made the following:
3
ORDER:
Sri Venkata Suneel Reddy, learned counsel represented on behalf of counsel on record for the petitioner, sought permission of this Court for withdrawal of the Writ Petition and the same is endorsed on the bundle.
Permission is accorded.
Accordingly, the Writ Petition is dismissed as withdrawn. There shall be no order as to costs.
As a sequel thereto, miscellaneous petitions pending, if any, shall stand closed.
___________________________________ JUSTICE TARLADA RAJASEKHAR RAO Date: 23.09.2025 Harin
4
691 THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE TARLADA RAJASEKHAR RAO
W.P.No. 12051 OF 2023
Date: 23-09-2025
Harin