Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Rajasthan · body

2025 DAILYLAW 45673 (RAJ)

RAMPAL @ LAXMIKANT MEENA S/O SHRI JAGDISH PRASAD MEENA v. STATE OF RAJASTHAN

CRLMB/12826/2025 · 2025-11-26

Sameer Jain

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

[2025:RJ-JP:47988] HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR S.B. Criminal Miscellaneous Bail Application No. 12826/2025 Rampal @ Laxmikant Meena S/o Shri Jagdish Prasad Meena, Aged About 32 Years, R/o Maheshwari Khurd, Police Station Sadar Dausa, District Dausa At Present Rent Holder Plot No. A- 15, Green Park Colony, Agra Road, Jaipur (Raj.) (At Present Confined At Central Jail Jaipur) ----Applicant Versus State Of Rajasthan, Through PP ----Respondent For Applicant(s) : Mr. Ramawtar Meena For Respondent(s) : Mr. Rhishi Raj Singh Rathore, PP Ms. Arti Sharma, PP HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SAMEER JAIN Order 26/11/2025 1. The instant bail application has been filed under Section 483 BNSS on behalf of accused-applicant. The accused-applicant was arrested in connection with FIR No. 287/2025 registered at Police Station Jamdoli District Jaipur City (East) for the offence(s) under Sections 189(2), 115(2), 126(2), 307, 109(1) of BNS, 2023. 2. Learned counsel for the accused-applicant submitted that the applicant has been falsely implicated in the matter. It is submitted that the injury sustained by the complainant is on hand. It is also submitted that the application of Section 109 of BNS is erroneous. It is further submitted that the charge-sheet [2025:RJ-JP:47988] (2 of 2) [CRLMB-12826/2025] has already been filed and that the trial will take its own time to conclude. 3. Per contra, learned Public Prosecutor has vehemently opposed the bail application and has relied upon the injury report dated 31.08.2025, wherein it is stated that the victim sustained a grievous injury on the arm. It is further submitted that the injury report reflects that the patient was admitted to the hospital and was in a semi-conscious state. It is also submitted that there are five criminal antecedents against the applicant, one of which is of a similar nature. 4. Having heard the submissions made by the learned counsel for the parties, and taking note of the fact that the victim sustained a grievous injury on the arm; that the injury report reflects that the patient was admitted to the hospital and was in a semi-conscious state; that there are five criminal antecedents against the applicant, one of which is of a similar nature, this Court is not inclined to allow the present bail application. 5. Accordingly, the bail application under Section 483 BNSS is dismissed at this stage. (SAMEER JAIN),J JKP/42