Research › Search › Judgment

Allahabad High Court · body

2025 DAILYLAW 45669 (ALL)

KRIPASHANKAR YADAV AND ANOTHER v. STATE OF U.P. AND 2 OTHERS

A227/3921/2025 · 2025-05-06

Nand Prabha Shukla

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

Neutral Citation No. - 2025:AHC:73639 Court No. - 81 Case :- MATTERS UNDER ARTICLE 227 No. - 3921 of 2025 Petitioner :- Kripashankar Yadav And Another Respondent :- State Of U.P. And 2 Others Counsel for Petitioner :- Himanshu Srivastava,Madan Lal Srivastava Counsel for Respondent :- G.A. Hon'ble Ms. Nand Prabha Shukla,J. Heard learned counsel for the petitioners, learned A.G.A. for the State and perused the record. The present petition under Article 227 of the Constitution of India has been filed with prayer to direct the District and Sessions Judge, MIrzapur to consider and decide the Stay Application in Criminal Revision NO. 224 of 2024 (Alok Kumar Singh and another vs. Manoj Kumar Singh and another) under Sections 438, 440 of BNSS, Police Station Chunar, District Mirzapur as expeditiously as possible preferably within the time stipulated by this Hon'ble Court. It is submitted by learned counsel for the petitioners that the matter is pending consideration before the court concerned. Expeditious disposal of a case is the right of every litigant and it is expected from every Court to endeavour to dispose of a case pending before it, expeditiously. Learned A.G.A. has no objection in this regard. Considering the facts and circumstances of the case and submission made by learned counsel for petitioners, it is expedient to direct the court concerned to make its endeavour to decide the case as expeditiously as possible without granting any unnecessary or long adjournments to either of the parties, if there is no other legal impediment. With the aforesaid directions, the petition stands disposed of finally. Order Date :- 7.5.2025 Puspendra Digitally signed by :- PUSPENDRA NARAYAN SINGH High Court of Judicature at Allahabad