Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Rajasthan · body

2025 DAILYLAW 45667 (RAJ)

AMIT KASWAN S/O SUBE SINGH KASWAN v. THE STATE OF RAJASTHAN

CW/18165/2025 · 2025-11-25

Ashok Kumar Jain

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

[2025:RJ-JP:47867] HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR S.B. Civil Writ Petition No. 18165/2025 Amit Kaswan S/o Sube Singh Kaswan, Aged About 30 Years, R/o Vpo Asani, Tehsil Bhadra, District Hanumangarh, Rajasthan ----Petitioner Versus 1. The State Of Rajasthan, Through Its Principal Education Secretary, Government Secretariat, Rajasthan, Jaipur. 2. The Director, Secondary Education, Rajasthan, Bikaner. 3. Rajasthan Public Service Commission, Through Its Secretary, Ajmer. ----Respondents For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Ram Pratap Saini For Respondent(s) : HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ASHOK KUMAR JAIN Order 25/11/2025 1. This writ petition has been filed by the petitioner with the following prayer:- “i) By an appropriate writ order or direction, respondents be directed to fill up all the vacant posts of Senior Physical Education Teacher, which have been fallen vacant due to non- joining of some candidates or declaration of the ineligible by respondents from the reserve list dated 20.06.2024. ii) By an appropriate writ order or direction, respondents be directed to fill up total posts of Senior Physical Education Teacher, which advertised in advertisement dated 08.07.2022. iii) By an appropriate writ order or direction, respondents be directed to operate the reserve list of Senior Physical Education Teacher. [2025:RJ-JP:47867] (2 of 2) [CW-18165/2025] iv) By an appropriate writ, order or direction the respondents be directed to give same benefit to the petitioner as has been given in the case of Pawan Meena Vs. State of Rajasthan & Ors. SBCWP No.1665/2024 decided on 02.02.2024 (supra). 2. During course of arguments, learned counsel for petitioner submits that the petitioner may be granted permission to file an appropriate representation before the respondents- Authority to consider and resolve his grievances. 3. Considered the grievance raised herein, the petitioner is given a liberty to submit a representation to the respondents-Authority within a period of 30 days raising all grounds and the respondents-Authority are directed to consider and decide the representation after enquiry about grievances, raised by the petitioner but with a reasoned and speaking order within a period of 30 days from date of receipt of representation. After the order, the respondents are under an obligation to communicate the decision to the petitioner either by way of speed post or through E-mail, if petitioner has provided E-mail in his representation. If the petitioner is still aggrieved, he is at liberty to approach this Court with fresh petition. 4. With the aforesaid directions, the present writ petition with pending application, if any, stands disposed of. (ASHOK KUMAR JAIN),J GAURAV /43