Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Andhra Pradesh · body

2025 DAILYLAW 45663 (AP)

PULIMI NARASIMHA REDDY v. THE STATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH

CRLP/8961/2022 · 2025-02-09

Venkata Jyothirmai Pratapa

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

APHC010612212022 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI FRIDAY, THE TWENTY FIFTH DAY OF JULY TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE DR JUSTICE VENKATA JYOTHIRMAI PRATAPA I.A No.1 of 2025 In CRIMINAL PETITION NO: 8961 OF 2022 Between; 1. Pulimi Narasimha Reddy, S/o.Venku Reddy, aged 73 years, R/o.D.No. 26-3-1062, 4^'' Street, Teachers Colony, Vedayapalem, Nellore City, Nellore District. 2. Pulimi Bhavani, W/o.Narasimha Reddy, aged about 62 years, 4**^ Street, Teachers Colony, Vedayapalem, Nellore City, Nellore District. 3. Smt. Ambati Sumana, W/o.Surender Reddy, aged about 38 years, R/o.D.No. 11-1-277, Santhi Nagar, Mandabailu Center, Kovuru, SPS Nellore District. ...Petitioners/Petitioners AND 1. The State oOf Andhra Pradesh, through its Public Prosecutor, High Court of A.P. at Amaravathi. 2. Smt Pulimi Lakshmi Prasanna, W/o.Harikrishna Reddy, aged about 40 years, SHAR Colony, Andhra Kesari Nagar, Bhaktavastala Nagar, Nellore City, SPS Nellore District. ...Respondents/Respondents Petition filed under Section 482 of Cr.PC/Section 528 of BNSS praying that in the circumstances stated i petition, the High Court in the affidavit filed in support of the may be pleased to direct the Registry above CrI.P. for being mentioned for to list the clarifying regarding dispensation of the presence of Petitioner Nos.1 and 2 in C.C.No.1861 of 2022 Nellore. on each and every date of adjournment on the file of the Court of the V Additional JFCM, Counsel for the Petitioners : Counsel for the Respondent Sri V.V.L.N.Sarma No.1:Ms.K.Priyanka Lakshmi, Assistant Public Prosecutor No.2:Sri Siva Prasad Reddy Venati Counsel for the Respondent The Court made the following: ORDER: Heard. Sri V.V.L.N.Sarma, learned counsel for the Petitioners would submit I condition of the Petitioners/Accused presence before the trial Court may be dispensed Ms.K.Pnyanka Lakshmi, learned Asst.Public Prosecutor that the Court may pass appropriate orders. that. considering the age and health Nos.2 and 3, their with, would submit Considering the submissions ^acle, this petition is allowed The presence o, the Petitioners/Accused Nos.2 and 3 before the trial Court is drspensed with, except on the specific dates as directed by the trial Court Registry is directed to issue fresh copy of the order. Sd/-USRIDEVI ASSISTANT REGISTRAR //TRUE COPY// To SECTION OFFICER 1- The V Additional Judicial District. Magistrate of First Class, Nellore, Nellore 2. One CC to Sri V.V.L.N.Sarma, Advocate [OPUC] 3. One CC to Sri Siva Prasad Reddy Venati, Advocate [OPUC] 4. Two CCs to the Public Prosecutor, High Court of A.P., Amaravati.[OUT] 5. The Section Officer, Criminal Section, High Court of A.P., Amaravati. 6. Two CD Copies BSV sree m HIGH COURT DATED: 25/07/2025 % m f c 5 4lj(; 2025 Curreni beciion . 'W ORDER I.A No.1 of 2025 in CRLP.No.8961 of 2022 ORDERING THE I.A.