Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Andhra Pradesh · body

2025 DAILYLAW 45662 (AP)

Yandra Suresh, v. THE STATE OF AP

WP/9193/2019 · 2025-12-09

B V L N Chakravarthi

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

APHC010209842019 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3368] WEDNESDAY, THE TENTH DAY OF DECEMBER TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE B V L N CHAKRAVARTHI WRIT PETITION NO: 9193/2019 Between: 1. YANDRA SURESH, S/O YANDRA KOTESWARA RAO, AGED ABOUT 28 YEARS, R/O D.NO.6C-12-11, DAKSHINAPU VEEDHI, ELURU, WEST GODAVARI DISTRICT. ...PETITIONER AND 1. THE STATE OF AP, REP. BY ITS PRINCIPAL SECRETARY, HOME DEPARTMENT, SECRETARIAT BUILDINGS, VELAGAPUDI, GUNTUR DISTRICT. 2. THE DEPUTY SUPERINTENDENT OF POLICE, ELURU TOWN, WEST GODAVARI DISTRICT. 3. THE STATION HOUSE OFFICER, II TOWN P.S., ELURU, WEST GODAVARI DISTRICT. ...RESPONDENT(S): Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased to issue an appropriate order or direction especially one in the nature of Writ of Mandamus declaring the in action of the 2nd respondent in not considering the petitioner's representation dated 08-07-2019 and continuously interfering into the peaceful possession and enjoyment of the petitioner's house property in D.No.22B-1-23/5, T.S. No.745, 746, Assessment No.24092, an extent of 293 Sq.yds., situated at Powerpet, G.N.T. Road, Eluru Municipal Corporation, Eluru Sub- 2 Division, West Godavari District and tried to evict the petitioner forcibly from their possession by interfering into the civil disputes is illegal, improper, arbitrary and violation of Article 14, 19 and 21 of Constitution of India. Consequently direct the 3rd respondent not to interfere into the peaceful possession and enjoyment of the petitioner's house property in D.No.22B-1-23/5, T.S. No.745, 746, Assessment No.24092, an extent of 293 Sq.yds., situated at Powerpet, G.N.T. Road, Eluru Municipal Corporation, Eluru Sub- Division, West Godavari District IA NO: 1 OF 2019 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to direct the 3rd respondent not to interfere into the peaceful possession and enjoyment of the petitioner's house property in D.No.22B-1-23/5, T.S. No.745, 746, Assessment No.24092, an extent of 293 Sq.yds., situated at Powerpet, G.N.T. Road, Eluru Municipal Corporation, Eluru Sub- Division, West Godavari District Counsel for the Petitioner: 1. G SAI NARAYANA RAO Counsel for the Respondent(S): 1. GP FOR HOME (AP) The Court made the following: 3 THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE B.V.L.N.CHAKRAVARTHI WRIT PETITION No.9193 OF 2019 ORDER: This Writ Petition is filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India for the following relief: <….to issue an appropriate order or direction especially one in the nature of Writ of Mandamus declaring the in action of the 2nd respondent in not considering the petitioner's representation dated 08-07-2019 and continuously interfering into the peaceful possession and enjoyment of the petitioner's house property in D.No.22B-1-23/5, T.S. No.745, 746, Assessment No.24092, an extent of 293 Sq.yds., situated at Powerpet, G.N.T. Road, Eluru Municipal Corporation, Eluru Sub-Division, West Godavari District and tried to evict the petitioner forcibly from their possession by interfering into the civil disputes is illegal, improper, arbitrary and violation of Article 14, 19 and 21 of Constitution of India. Consequently direct the 3rd respondent not to interfere into the peaceful possession and enjoyment of the petitioner's house property in D.No.22B-1-23/5, T.S. No.745, 746, Assessment No.24092, an extent of 293 Sq.yds., situated at Powerpet, G.N.T. Road, Eluru Municipal Corporation, Eluru Sub-Division, West Godavari District, and pass…= 2. Sri R.Mallikaruna Rao, learned Assistant Government Pleader for Home on written instructions would submit that the matter is of civil in nature, and respondents will not interfere in the civil disputes. 3. Heard learned counsel representing Sri G.Sai Narayana Rao, learned counsel for the writ petitioner. 4. In the light of submissions made by the learned Assistant Government Pleader, as the matter is of civil in nature, and police will not interfere in civil disputes, no further orders are required in the writ petition. 5. Accordingly, the writ petition is closed. There shall be no order as to costs. 4 As a sequel thereto, interlocutory applications, if any, pending in this Writ Petition shall stand closed. ______________________________ JUSTICE B.V.L.N. CHAKRAVARTHI 10.12.2025 Pmk 5 13 THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE B.V.L.N. CHAKRAVARTHI WRIT PETITION No:9193 OF 2019 Date: 10.12.2025 Pmk