APHC010610412023 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3396] WEDNESDAY, THE TENTH DAY OF DECEMBER TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE DR JUSTICE VENKATA JYOTHIRMAI PRATAPA WRIT PETITION NO: 31594/2023 Between: 1. TIRAMAREDDY SRINIVASU, S/O TIRAMAREDDY MANIKYAM, AGED ABOUT 44 YEARS, OCC. CULTIVATION, Y.B.AGRAHARAM,NATHAVARAM MANDAL, ANAKAPALLI DISTRICT. ...PETITIONER AND 1. THE STATE OF AP, REPRESENTED BY IT'S PRINCIPAL SECRETARY, HOME DEPARTMENT, SECRETARIAT BUILDING, VELAGAPUDI. AMARAVATI, GUNTUR DISTRICT. 2. THE SUPERINTENDENT OF POLICE, ANAKAPALLI DISTRICT, AT ANAKAPALLI. 3. THE CIRCLE INSPECTOR OF POLICE, NARSIPATNAM POLICE STATION, ANAKAPALLI DISTRICT. 4. THE SUB INSPECTOR OF POLICE, NATHAVARAM POLICE STATION, NATHAVARAM, ANAKAPALLI DISTRICT. 5. GOPALLI NAGESWARA RAO, S/O APPANNA, AGED ABOUT 53 YEARS, R/O 1-155, Y.B.AGRAHARAM, NATHAVARAM MANDAL, ANAKAPALLI DISTRICT. ...RESPONDENT(S): Counsel for the Petitioner: 1. T V SRI DEVI Counsel for the Respondent(S): 1. GP FOR HOME 2. CH MURALI KRISHNA The Court made the following: ORDER: This Writ Petition is filed under Article 226 of Constitution of India with the following prayer for: “.... to issue a writ, order or direction more particularly one in the nature of Mandamus declaring the action of the respondents 3 and 4 in interfering with petitioner's possession and enjoyment of land to an extent of Ac 1.10 cents in Sy No. 20/7 (old Sy No. 58), Y.B. Agraharam Village, Nathavaram Mandal, Anakapalli District without considering petitioner's possession and pendency of civil disputes between petitioner and 5th respondent is illegal, arbitrary and 2 violative of Article 14, 21 and 300-A of Constitution of India and opposed to the principles of natural justice” 2. Heard Ms.T.V.Sridevi, learned counsel for the petitioner and Sri Ajay Babu, learned Assistant Government Pleader for Home. 3. Learned Assistant Government Pleader for Home would submit that based on the complaint made by respondent No.5, police registered a case in Crime No.154 of 2023 for the offences punishable under Sections 447, 323 and 506 read with 34 IPC against the petitioner. Learned Assistant Government Pleader would further submit that the police are not interfering in a civil dispute between the parties. 4. Recording the said submissions, the Writ Petition is disposed of. However, the police are directed to follow due process of law regarding the crime which is registered against the petitioner. There shall be no order as to costs. As a sequel thereto, miscellaneous petitions, if any, pending shall stand closed. ________________________________________ Dr.JUSTICE VENKATA JYOTHIRMAI PRATAPA Date:10.12.2025 Asr 3 HON’BLE DR. JUSTICE VENKATA JYOTHIRMAI PRATAPA W.P.No.31594 of 2023 Dt.10.12.2025 Asr