APHC010153792014 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3459] TUESDAY, THE TWENTY THIRD DAY OF SEPTEMBER TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SMT JUSTICE SUMATHI JAGADAM WRIT PETITION NO: 26070/2014 Between: 1. VINAYASHRAM, KAVURU, CHERUKUPALLY MANDAL, GUNTUR DISTRICT A.P., REP. BY ITS MANAGING TRUSTEE MR. THUMMALA TULASIDAS. 2. PROF. N.G.RANGA KRISHI VIGNANA KENDRA, KAVURU, CHERUKUPALLY MANDAL, GUNTUR DISTRICT, A.P., REP. BY ITS CHAIRMAN MR. THUMMALA TULASIDAS. 3. THUMMALA TULASIDAS, S/O. KRISHNAIAH, AGED ABOUT 79 YEARS, OCC: CULTIVATION, R/O. KAVURU, CHERUKUPALLY MANDAL, GUNTUR DISTRICT, A.P. ...PETITIONER(S) AND 1. THE INDIAN COUNCIL OF AGRICULTURAL RESEARCH, DIVISION OF AGRICULTURAL EXTENSION, KRISHI ANUSANDHAN BHAVAN, PUSA, NEW DELHI - 110012, REP. BY ITS DIRECTOR GENERAL. 2. THE INDIAN COUNCIL OF AGRICULTURAL RESEARCH, ZONAL PROJECT DIRECTORATE (ZONE-V), CRIDA CAMPUS, SANTOSHNAGAR, HYDERABAD - 500059, REP. BY ITS ZONAL PROJECT DIRECTOR. ...RESPONDENT(S): Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased to issue an appropriate writ, order or direction, more particularly one in the nature of Writ of Mandamus, declaring the proceedings of the 1st respondent dated 07.07.2014, in F.No.5-15212002 AE-II (Pt.IV) in refusing to permit the 3rd petitioner to operate the bank accounts of the petitioners 1 and 2 on the ground that the matter is subjudice, as arbitrary, illegal, unjust, without jurisdiction, colourable exercise of power, discriminatory, violative of Articles 14 of the Constitution of India and consequently direct the respondents to permit the petitioners to operate the bank accounts and continue the 3rd petitioner to run the day to day affairs of the 2nd petitioner as its Chairman and pass IA NO: 1 OF 2014(WPMP 32582 OF 2014 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased direct the respondents to consider the representation of the petitioners dated 12.06.2014, without reference to other issues, pending disposal of the above writ petition and pass Counsel for the Petitioner(S): 1. C V R RUDRA PRASAD Counsel for the Respondent(S): 1. RAJA SHEKAR RAO SALVAJI 2. The Court made the following ORDER: Sri T.B.L. Murthy, learned counsel, representing Sri C.V.R. Rudra Prasad, learned counsel for the petitioners, submits that the cause in the writ petition does not survive for adjudication. Recording the submission of learned counsel appearing for the petitioners, the Writ Petition is dismissed as infructuous. No order as to costs. As a sequel, miscellaneous applications pending, if any, shall stand closed. __________________________ JUSTICE SUMATHI JAGADAM Date: 23.09.2025 KAS 582 THE HONOURABLE SMT JUSTICE SUMATHI JAGADAM WRIT PETITION NO: 26070/2014 Date: 23.09.2025 KAS