[2025:RJ-JP:46949] HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR S.B. Criminal Bail Cancellation Application No. 43/2025 Dhanraj S/o Kishan, R/o Kethuda, P.s. Talera, District Bundi (Raj.). ----Petitioner Versus 1. State Of Rajasthan, Through Pp 2. Hanuman S/o Devlal, R/o Banjara Basti, Kathuda, P.s. Talera, District Bundi (Raj.) ----Respondents For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Naresh Kumar Meena for Mr. Mohar Pal Meena For Respondent(s) : Ms. Arti Sharma, PP Mr. Rhishi Raj Singh Rathore, PP Mr. Deepak Pareek HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SAMEER JAIN Judgment 20/11/2025 1. Present bail cancellation application is moved under Section 483(3) of BNSS by the complainant/applicant seeking cancellation of bail granted to the accused-non-applicant No. 2 vide order dated 10.01.2025 in connection with FIR No. 396/2024 registered at Police Station Talera District Bundi for the offences under Section 126(2), 115(2) BNS. 2. Learned counsel for the applicant has submitted that the accused/non-applicant was released on bail vide an order dated 10.01.2025. It is further submitted that on 19.01.2025, the applicant has received serious threats and an attempt to cause injury has been made by the accused/non-applicant. Howsoever, no FIR was ever came to be lodged by the applicant in this regard. [2025:RJ-JP:46949] (2 of 2) [CRLBC-43/2025] 3. Learned Public Prosecutor has supported the instant application. 4. Per contra, learned counsel for the accused/non- applicant has opposed the instant application. It is submitted that facts as narrated by counsel for the applicant are not correct. Howsoever, it is submitted that the accused/non-applicant has undertaken that he shall restrain himself from disturbing the peaceful living of the applicant and shall not make an attempt to establish any contact or cause threat to the applicant. 5. Having heard the arguments advanced by learned counsel for the parties and considering the fact that an undertaking has been furnished by the accused/non-applicant refraining himself from disturbing the peaceful living of the applicant and looking to the overall facts and circumstances of the case and material on record but without commenting on merits/demerits of the case, this court is not inclined to allow the present bail cancellation application. 6. Present bail cancellation application is dismissed. (SAMEER JAIN),J Pooja /226