[2025:RJ-JP:47806] HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR S.B. Civil Writ Petition No. 17964/2025 1. Devilal Saran S/o Kisana Ram Saran, Aged About 32 Years, R/o Baba Ramdev Mandir Ke Pichhe, Bikaner, Dis- trict Bikaner , Rajasthan - 334001. (Owner Of The Vehicle No. Rj07Ge5175). 2. Shri Venkateshwara Tiles, Through Its Proprietor Vijay Pal Godara S/o Kana Ram Godara, Aged About 29 Years R/o B-31, Pancholi Vihar Hem Marg New Sanganer Road, So- dala, Jaipur, Rajasthan-302019 (Owner Of The Vehicle No. Rj07Ge7799). ----Petitioners Versus 1. State Of Rajasthan, Transport Department Of Rajasthan, Secretariat, Jaipur, Rajasthan, Through Secretary. 2. Department Of Mining And Geology, State Of Rajasthan, Secretariat Jaipur Rajasthan Through Joint Secretary. 3. Commissioner, Transport Department, Government Of Ra- jasthan, Jaipur. 4. Regional Transport Officer (Rto) Bikaner, At Rto Office Bikaner District Bikaner Rajasthan. 5. Regional Transport Officer (Rto) Jaipur, At Rto Office Jaipur, District Jaipur Rajasthan. ----Respondents For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Sachin Kumar For Respondent(s) : Mr. Sachin Singh Rathore with Mr. Tanishq Aditya Parmar for Mr. S.S. Naruka, AAG HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SANDEEP TANEJA Order 24/11/2025 1. Learned counsel for the petitioners submits that the controversy involved in the present writ petition has already been decided by a co-ordinate Bench of this Court in S.B. Civil Writ [2025:RJ-JP:47806] (2 of 3) [CW-17964/2025] Petition No.17894/2025 (Tofik Ahmed & ors. Vs. State of Rajasthan & Ors) decided on 20.11.2025. 2. Learned counsel for the State does not refute the fact that similar controversy has been decided. 3. The co-ordinate Bench has decided the writ petition & opera- tive portion of the same is as follows:- “6. Having heard the contentions made by the learned counsel for the parties, taking note of the material available on record in the petition, and the judgments cited at the Bar, this Court without going into the arena of disputed questions of facts and merits of the petition, is of a view that the impugned order, whereby the Registration Certificates of the vehicles owned / possessed by the petitioners are suspended, needs to be set aside, for the reasons that the said vehicles are the source of bread and butter of the petitioners and their families. However, the aforementioned revocation shall only be effective subject to a condition that the petitioners along with their counsel concerned shall re- port to / before the notice issuing authorities, on 05.12.2025, preferably in-between 11:00 am to 01:00 pm. Thereafter, due reply be filed within a period of 15 days. 7. Audience with respect to the same will be provided by competent authority on 20.12.2025. Adjudication of the same be carried out thereafter within a period of 15 days. 8. It is made clear that during the period of considera- tion of grievances, the RCs of the vehicles owned/ possessed by the petitioners, which are suspended, shall be revoked and the status of the vehicle in furtherance to the consequential proceedings as regis- tered and entered upon the official portal concerned, shall be updated, without further ado. [2025:RJ-JP:47806] (3 of 3) [CW-17964/2025] 9. It is made clear that no prejudice will be caused to either side on account of passing of the present order. 10. In the light of the same, the present writ petition stands disposed of with the aforementioned directions being granted. Pending applications, if any, stand disposed of.” 4. Accordingly, the present writ petition is also disposed of in the same terms. (SANDEEP TANEJA),J Keshav /38