JAGADISH CHANDRA BAG AND ANR v. UTTAM KUMAR HALDER
CO/3622/2022 · 2025-03-19
Bibhas Ranjan De
body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 45650 (CAL) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 45650 (CAL) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
Item No. 141 Ct 22 rup
19.03. 2025 IN THE HIGH COURT AT CALCUTTA CIVIL REVISIONAL JURISDICTION APPELLATE SIDE C.O. 3622 of 2022 IA NO: CAN 1 of 2024
Jagadish Chandra Bag & Anr. Vs Uttam Kumar Halder Mr. Uttam Kumar Halder. .… opposite party (in-person).
1. Affidavit-in-opposition filed by the opposite party be taken on record.
2. Learned counsel appearing on behalf of the opposite party is present.
3. None appears on behalf of the petitioners on repeated call.
4. It appears that petitioners are not at all willing to proceed with this revisional application further which is pending since 2022.
5. Thus, the revisional application stands dismissed for default.
6. Interim order, if any, stands vacated.
7. Connected application, if there be any, also stands dismissed accordingly.
8. Department is directed to communicate this order to the learned Trial Court.
(Bibhas Ranjan De, J.)
2