Ganta Surynarayana v. The State of Andhra Pradesh,
WP/20131/2025 · 2025-09-24
Venkateswarlu Nimmagadda
body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 45650 (AP) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 45650 (AP) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
APHC010390212025
IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3329] THURSDAY,THE TWENTY FIFTH DAY OF SEPTEMBER TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE VENKATESWARLU NIMMAGADDA WRIT PETITION NO: 20131/2025 Between:
1. GANTA SURYNARAYANA, S/O RAMULU AGED ABOUT 64 YEARS, COOLIE, R/O CHUKKAPETA VILLAGE, DATTIRAJERU MANDAL, VIZIANGARAM DISTRICT. 2. REESU RAMU, S/O APPANNA AGED ABOUT 65 YEARS. COOLIE, R/O CHUKKAPET VILLAGE, GUTCHIMI POST, DATTIRAJERU MANDAL, VIZIANGARAM DISTRICT. 3. IMANDI DEVUDU, S/O PENTAYYA AGED ABOUT 64 YEARS. COOLIE,
R/O CHUKKAPET VILLAGE, GUTCHIMI POST, DATTIRAJERU MANDAL, VIZIANAGARAM DISTRICT. 4. GADADESI NARAYANA, S/O SIMHACHALAM AGED ABOUT 82 YEARS. COOLIE, R/O CHUKKAPET VILLAGE, GUTCHIMI POST, DATTIRAJERU MANDAL, VIZIANAGARAM DISTRICT. 5. TALARI SANYASI, S/O RAMULU AGED ABOUT 81 YEARS. COOLIE,
R/O CHUKKAPET VILLAGE, GUTCHIMI POST, DATTIREJERU MANDAL, VIZIANAGARAM DISTRICT. 6. GANTA ESWARA RAO, S/O RAMUDU AGED ABOUT 62 YEARS. COOLIE,
R/O CHUKKAPET VILLAGE, GUTCHIMI POST, DATTIRAJERU MANDAL, VIZIANAGARAM DISTRICT. 7. KONISI APPA RAO, S/O BALARAM AGED ABOUT 65 YEARS. COOLIE,
R/O CHUKKAPET VILLAGE, GUTCHIMI POST, DATTIRAJERU MANDAL, VIZIANAGARAM DISTRICT. 8. GANTA SAYAM, S/O RAMUDU AGED ABOUT 62 YEARS, COOLIE,
R/O CHUKKAPET VILLAGE, GUTCHIMI POST, DATTIRAJERU MANDAL, VIZIANAGARAM DISTRICT. 9. KOSURI PYDITALLI, S/O MADAYYA AGED ABOUT 66 YEARS. COOLIE,
R/O CHUKKAPET VILLAGE, GUTCHIMI POST, DATTIRAJERU MANDAL, VIZIANAGARAM DISTRICT. 10. YADIA APPANA, S/O RAMU AGED ABOUT 60 YEARS, COOLE, R/B CHUKKAPET VILLAGE, GUTCHIMI POST, DATTIRAJERU MANDAL, VIZIANAGARAM DISTRICT
11. TIPPANA KAMAYYA, S/O RAMULU AGED ABOUT 61 YEARS. COOLIE,
R/O CHUKKAPET VILLAGE, GUTCHIMI POST, DATTIRAJERU MANDAL, VIZIANAGARAM DISTRICT. 12. GADELA SIMHACHALAM, W/O AGED ABOUT 66 YEARS. COOLIE, R/O CHOWDANTIVALASA VILLAGE,
RAMABADRAPURAM, DATTIRAJERU MANDAL VIZIANAGARAM DISTRICT. 13. KIRLA SURYANARAYANA, S/O ADAYYA AGED ABOUT 77 YEARS. COOLIE, R/O CHOWDANTIVALASA VILLAGE, DATTIRAJERU MANDAL, VIZIANAGARAM DISTRICT. 14. DATTI SIMHACHALAMMA, W/O SIMHACHALAM AGED ABOUT 78 YEARS. COOLIE,
R/O CHOWDANTIVALASA VILLAGE, DATTIRAJERU MANDAL, VIZIANAGARAM DISTRICT
15. PETTALA RUGUTI, W/O RAMA RAO AGED ABOUT 54 YEARS. COOLIE, R/O CHOWDANTIVALASA VILLAGE, DATTIRAJERU MANDAL, VIZIANAGARAM DISTRICT. 16. NANDA RAMU, S/A RAMAYYA AGED ABOUT 63 YEARS, COOLIE, R/O CHOWDANTIVALASA VILLAGE, DATTIRAJERU MANDAL, VIZIANAGARAM DISTRICT
17. KOTTAPALLI SEETHALAKSHMI, W/O NARASIMHA MURTHY AGED ABOUT 75 YEARS. COOLIE, R/O CHOWDANTIVALASA VILLAGE, DATTIRAJERU MANDAL, VIZIANAGARAM DISTRICT
18. GEDALA BANGARAMMA, W/O SURYANARAYANA AGED ABOUT 84 YEARS, COOLIE, R/O CHOWDANTIVALASA VILLAGE, DATTIRAJERU MANDAL, VIZIANAGARAM DISTRICT
19. RAPAKA RAMAMURTHY, S/O LAKSHMAYYA AGED ABOUT 76 YEARS COOLIE, R/O DASUPET VILLAGE, DATTIRAJERU
MANDAL, VIZIANAGARAM DISTRICT. 20. PEDAPALLI THAVITAYYA, S/O TAMMINAIDU AGED ABOUT 74 YEARS.
COOLIE, R/O DASUPET VILLAGE, DATTIRAJERU MANDAL, VIZIANAGARAM DISTRICT. 21. MITTIREDDY PAIDITALLI, S/O VEERAPPA AGED ABOUT 73 YEARS. COOLIE, R/O DASUPET VILLAGE, DATTIRAJERU MANDAL, VIZIANAGARAM DISTRICT. 22. RAPAKA SATYAM, S/O BANGARI AGED ABOUT 74 YEARS. COOLIE, R/O DASUPET VILLAGE, DATTIRAJERU MANDAL VIZIANAGARAM DISTRICT. 23. RAPAKA GOWRAMMA, W/O APPALSWAMY AGED ABOUT 50 YEARS. COOLIE, R/O DASUPET VILLAGE, DATTIRAJERU MANDAL VIZIANAGARAM DISTRICT. 24. TARLADA SANTA, D/O SATYAM AGED ABOUT 43 YEARS, COOLIE, R/O DASUPET VILLAGE, DATTIRAJERU MANDAL VIZIANAGARAM DISTRICT. ...PETITIONER(S) AND
1. THE STATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH, REP. BY ITS PRINCIPAL SECRETARY, PANCHAYAT RAJ AND RURAL DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT
SECRETARIAT, VELAGAPUDI, AMARAVATI., GUNTUR DISTRICT. 2. THE DISTRICT COLLECTOR, VIZIANAGARAM DISTRICT, VIZIANAGARAM. 3. THE DISTRICT PANCHAYAT OFFICER, VIZIANAGARAM DISTRICT, VIZIANAGARAM. 4. THE TAHSILDAR, DATTIRAJERU MANDAL,
DATTIRAJERU, VIZIANAGARAM DISTRICT. 5. THE MANDAL PARISHAD DEVELOPMENT OFFICER, DATTIRAJERU MANDAL, VIZIANAGARAM DISTRICT. 6. THE CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFIER, SOCIETY FOR ELIMINATIN OF RURAL POVERTY DEPARTMENT OF RURAL DEVELOPMENT GOVERNMENT OF ANDHRA PRADESH, MAYURI CENTE, Y-
JUNCTION, GOLLAPUDI, VIJAYAWADA. ...RESPONDENT(S): The Court made the following ORDER:
1. This Writ Petition is filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India seeking the following relief:
“to issue writ of mandamus or any other appropriate writ or direction the inaction of the respondents in deleting the petitioners pensions in the pensioners list under the scheme of Old Age and Single Woman pensions to them in the year 2019, in spite of the same is sanctioned to petitioners long back under Y.S.R. Pension Kanuka vide Pension ID Nos. 102864437, 102868838, 102868856, 102864843, 10286410286847, 102864858, 102868861, 102864851, 102467502,
102868862, 102868858,102469102, 102359568, 102339095, 10200002472, 10239985, 102895600, 102410712, 102865117, 102865118, 102865247, 102865123, 102204984 and 102868872 is illegal, arbitrary and violative of principals of natural justice and consequently direct them to pay the pensions to the petitioners forthwith and to pass such…..”
2. Heard the learned counsel for the petitioner and the learned Standing counsel for the 5th respondent. 3.
The learned counsel for the petitioners submits that the petitioners are permanent residents of Chukkupet, Chowdhantivalasa, and Dasupet villages of Dattirajeru Mandal, Vizianagaram District. The petitioners were identified as member of the Below Poverty Line families and low-income category group and
they are living in indigent conditions. Considering the same, the Government of Andhra Pradesh granted pensions to the petitioners from the year 2009 onwards. Pursuant thereto, the 4th respondent certified that the petitioners are eligible for pensions under the categories of Single Women Pension and Old Age Pension as per G.O.Ms.No.70, dated 08.06.2018. He further submits that without issuing any prior notice to the petitioners or inviting their objections, the Gram Panchayat Pensions Committee deleted the names of the petitioners from the list of beneficiaries of pension without assigning any valid reason. Consequently, the petitioners have submitted several representations since 2019 to the respondent authorities, requesting them to take steps for the disbursement of Old Age and Single Widow Pensions. It is further submitted that, despite several representations made since 2019 requesting for the release of pensions already sanctioned to them under the YSR Pension Kanuka Scheme, the respondent authorities neither considered, passed, nor duly sanctioned the social security pensions till date. Hence, the present Writ Petition. 4. On the other hand, the learned Standing Counsel for the 5th respondent furnished written instructions dated 24.09.2025, wherein it is stated that the petitioners are eligible persons and they are entitled to receive social security pensions. He further submits that the respondent authorities will consider the representations of the
petitioners and that, from the next month onwards, the pensions will be sanctioned to the petitioners pursuant to G.O.Ms.No.174. 5.
Considering the submissions made by the learned counsel for the petitioners and the learned Standing Counsel for the 5th respondent, and on perusal of the material available on record, and in view of the admitted fact on the part of the respondents that the petitioners are eligible and entitled to receive social security pensions as per G.O.Ms.No.174, the pensions are liable to be sanctioned to the petitioners with immediate effect. 6. In view of the clear and categorical admission on the part of the respondents, this Court is inclined to dispose of the present writ petition with a direction to respondent Nos. 5 and 6 to consider the representations of the petitioners and pass appropriate orders within a period of two (02) weeks from the date of receipt of a copy of this order. 7. With the above direction, the writ petition is disposed of. No costs. Consequently, Miscellaneous Petitions, if any, pending in the writ petition shall stand closed. ______________________________________ VENKATESWARLU NIMMAGADDA, J 25.09.2025 kkllkk
204 HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE VENKATESWARLU NIMMAGADDA
WRIT PETITION No.20131 of 2025
25.09.2025 kkllkk