HEERALAL BAIRWA S/O LALARAM BAIRWA v. STATE OF RAJASTHAN
CRLMP/7001/2025 · 2025-11-24
Anoop Kumar Dhand
body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 45649 (RAJ) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 45649 (RAJ) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR S.B. Criminal Miscellaneous (Petition) No. 7001/2025
1. Heeralal Bairwa S/o Lalaram Bairwa, Aged About 45 Years, R/o Village Sindoli, Gaura, Falyawas, Tehsil Bassi, District Jaipur. Rajasthan.
2. Arman Bairwa S/o Namuram, Aged About 19 Years, R/o Village Sindoli, Gaura, Falyawas, Tehsil Bassi, District Jaipur. Rajasthan. ----Petitioners Versus
1. State Of Rajasthan, Through P.p.
2. Hanuman S/o Jagdish Bairwa, Aged About 32 Years, R/o Plot No. 48, Govind Vihar C, Govindpura, Sanganer, District Jaipur ( Rajasthan). ----Respondents For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Anshul Sharma For Respondent(s) : Mr. Vivek Choudhary-PP Mr. Ravi Jangir Ms. Ruchika Sharma JUSTICE ANOOP KUMAR DHAND
Order 24/11/2025
1. The present misc. petition has been filed by the petitioners under Section 528 BNSS for quashing the FIR No. 711/2024 registered with Police Station Sanganer Sadar, District Jaipur City (South) for the offences under Sections 318(4), 316(2), 338, 336(3), 340(2) and 61(2)(a) of BNS 2023 on the basis of compromise between the parties.
2.
Learned counsel for the petitioners as well as counsel appearing on behalf of the complainant are in agreement that the parties have settled their dispute by entering into a compromise
(2 of 3) [CRLMP-7001/2025] and now the complainant does not want to prosecute the petitioners.
3. This Court vide order dated 03.11.2025 directed the parties to appear before the Investigating Officer for verification of the compromise and the Investigating Officer was further directed to submit the verification report along with criminal antecedents of the petitioners.
4. Pursuant to the aforesaid order passed by this Court, the SHO Police Station Sanganer Sadar, Jaipur (South) has furnished the verification report which verifies that the parties have settled their dispute and the complainant does not want to prosecute the petitioners and the petitioners are not having any criminal antecedents.
5. Considering the above factual aspect of the matter and looking to the fact that the dispute pertains to personal in nature and the complainant does not want to prosecute the petitioners and also applying the principles laid down by the Hon’ble Apex Court in the cases of Gian Singh Vs. State of Punjab and Anr. reported in 2012 (10) SCC 303 and The State of Madhya Pradesh vs. Laxmi Narayan and Ors. reported in 2019 (5) SCC 688, this Court deems it just and proper to invoke inherent powers of this Court contained under Section 528 BNSS.
6. Accordingly, the instant criminal misc. petition stands allowed. The impugned FIR No. 711/2024 registered with Police Station Sanganer Sadar, District Jaipur City (South) for the offences under Sections 318(4), 316(2), 338, 336(3), 340(2) and 61(2)(a) of BNS 2023 stands quashed.
(3 of 3) [CRLMP-7001/2025]
7. Stay application as well as all pending applications, if any, stand disposed of.
(ANOOP KUMAR DHAND),J Ashu/48