[2025:RJ-JP:50384] HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR S.B. Civil Writ Petition No. 18183/2025 Vinod Kumari Moad Wife Of Late Shri Navratan Gusiawal, Aged About 51 Years, Resident Of Pushpak Ke Balaji Mod, Sawai Madhopur At Present Posted At Principal, In Gita Devi Agarwal Ggsss, Adarsh Nagar-A, Sawai Madhopur. ----Petitioner Versus 1. State Of Rajasthan, Through Its Secretary, School Education Department, Government Of Rajasthan, Government Secretariat, Rajasthan, Jaipur. 2. Director, Secondary Education Cum Addl. State Project Director, Senior Samagra Sikhsha Abhiran, Smsa, Rajasthan, Bikaner. 3. Sonam Pathak, Now Posted In Place Of Petitioner At Gita Devi Agarwal Ggsss, Adarsh Nagar -A, Sawai Madhopur. ----Respondents For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Anoop Pareek For Respondent(s) : Mr. Vishal Kumar for Mr. Manoj Sharma, AAG HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ASHOK KUMAR JAIN Order 11/12/2025 1. This writ petition has been filed by the petitioner with the following prayer:- “It is, therefore, humbly prayed that Writ petition filed by the petitioner may kindly be accepted and allowed and impugned order dated 29.10.2025 along with transfer order dated 22.09.2025 may kindly be quashed and set-aside and further the respondent may allow the petitioner to continue as Principal in Gita Devi Agarwal GGSSS, Adarsh Nagar-A, [2025:RJ-JP:50384] (2 of 3) [CW-18183/2025] Sawai Madhopur with regular salary and all benefits.” 2. Learned counsel for petitioner submits that petitioner is a widow lady as her husband has expired on 07.05.2024. He also submits that the entire responsibility of the family is upon the petitioner. He further submits that appeal No.4413/2025 was dismissed by the Tribunal on 29.10.2025 but appeal of identical nature were allowed by the Tribunal. He further submits that as per policy, respondents are under an obligation to accommodate a widow female. 3. Learned counsel for respondent Nos. 1 and 2 submits that petitioner may submits a representation and same shall be considered in accordance with policy of the department. 4. Considered the grievance raised herein, the petitioner is given a liberty to submit a representation to the respondents-Authority within a period of 30 days raising all grounds and the respondents-Authority are directed to consider and decide the representation after enquiry about grievances, raised by the petitioner but with a reasoned and speaking order within a period of 30 days from date of receipt of representation. After the decision, the respondents are under an obligation to communicate the decision to the petitioner either by way of speed post or through E-mail, if petitioner has provided E-mail in her representation. If the petitioner is still aggrieved, she is at liberty to approach this Court with fresh petition. 5. In the meanwhile, transfer order dated 22.09.2025 shall remain stayed till decision of representation. [2025:RJ-JP:50384] (3 of 3) [CW-18183/2025] 6. With the aforesaid directions, the present writ petition with pending application, if any, stands disposed of. (ASHOK KUMAR JAIN),J PREETI VALECHA /71