Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Chhattisgarh · body

2025 DAILYLAW 4563 (CHH)

M/S SHRI ASHUTOSH STRUCTURES PVT. LTD. (PREVIOUS NAME SHRI ASHUTOSH ENGINEERING INDUSTRIES) v. CENTRAL BOARD OF TRUSTEES

WPL/39/2024 · 2025-08-17

Shri Rakesh Mohan Pandey

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

-1- 2025:CGHC:41650 NAFR HIGH COURT of CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR WPL No. 39 of 2024 M/s Shri Ashutosh Structures Pvt. Ltd. (Previous Name Shri Ashutosh Engineering Industries) Through Director Haldhari Lal Vyas S/o Late Mr. Gopal Lal Vyas, Aged About 61 Years, R/o H.No. 5, Krishna Nagar, Daganiya Raipur Chhattisgarh. ... Petitioner versus 1 - Central Board of Trustees Through Regional P.F. Commissiner -II (CC-II) Emplyees Provident Fund Organisation, Block - D, Scheme -32, Indira Gandhi Commercial Complex, Pandri Raipur Chhattisgarh. Pin -492004. 2 - Nagendra Prasad Tiwari, S/o Late Shri Babulal Tiwari, Aged About 54 Years R/o Ward No. 62, Lavkush Nagar, Nalghar Road, Rawabhta, Raipur Chhattisgarh. 3 - Sanjay Sharma, S/o Late Shri R.B. Sharma, Aged About 53 Years R/o Q. No. 2/a Avenue, B Street, Sector-1, Bhilai, District Durg Chhattisgarh. 4 - Balram Sahu S/o Late Shri Sitaram Sahu, Aged About 51 Years R/o Ward No. 03, Near To Radhakrishna Mandir, Kumhari District Durg Chhattisgarh. 5 - Saurabh Sharma, S/o Shri Arun Sharma, Aged About 37 Years R/o Parshuram Nagar, Professor Colony, Raipur Chhattisgarh. ... Respondent(s) (Cause Title is taken from Case Information System) For Petitioner : Mr. Amit Jaiswal, Advocate, on behalf of Mr. Ajay Pal Singh, Advocate For Respondent No.1 : Mr. Ashutosh Singh, Advocate Digitally signed by NADIM MOHLE -2- For Respondents No.2 to 5 : Mr. Ashwani Panicker, Advocate Hon'ble Shri Justice Rakesh Mohan Pandey Order on Board 18.08.2025 1) At the very outset, learned counsel appearing for the petitioner would seek permission of this Court to withdraw this writ petition with liberty prefer an appeal before the competent authority under the provisions of Section 7(I) of the Employees Provident Funds and Miscellaneous Provisions Act, 1952. 2) Not opposed by the other side. 3) Recording the submission made by learned counsel for the petitioner, this writ petition is dismissed as withdrawn with the liberty as prayed for. 4) Certified copy, if any, be returned after retaining its xerox copy. Sd/- (Rakesh Mohan Pandey) Judge NADIM