APHC010120432020 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3233] TUESDAY,THE TWENTY THIRD DAY OF SEPTEMBER TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE B KRISHNA MOHAN WRIT PETITION NO: 7347/2020 Between: 1. BAVIREDDY VENKATA NAGA MURALI,, S/O.NARASITNHA RAO, AGED ABOUT 47 YEARS, R/O.THUMMALA CHERUVU, MACHILIPATNAM, KRISHNA DISTRICT, AADHAR NO-8871 9827 5881. 2. NAGISETTY SRINIVASA RAO, S/O.VENKATA SWAMY, AGED ABOUT 50 YEARS, R/O.1-125-1, THUMMALA CHERUVU, MACHILIPATNAM, KRISHNA DISTRICT, AADHAR NO-5968 2490 1760. 3. NAGISETTY VENKATAPAIAH, S/O. VENKATA SWAMY, AGED ABOUT 53 YEARS, R/O.1-18, THUMMALA CHERUVU, MACHILIPATNAM, KRISHNA DISTRICT, AADHAR NO-8379 6887 5696. 4. BAVIREDDY DANAIAH NAIDU,, S/O.MARKENDAIYULU, AGED ABOUT 43 YEARS, R/O.1-33A, THUMMALA CHERUVU, MACHILIPATNAM, KRISHNA DISTRICT, AADHAR NO-9616 3160 3261. ...PETITIONER(S) AND 1. THE STATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH, THROUGH ITS PRINCIPAL SECRETARY, REVENUE DEPARTMENT, SECRETARIAT, VELAGAPUDI, AMARAVATHI, GUNTUR DISTRICT. 2. THE DISTRICT COLLECTOR, KRISHNA DISTRICT, CHILAKALAPUDI, 2 HBKM,J W.P.No.7347 of 2020 MACHILIPATNAM. 3. THE REVENUE DIVISIONAL OFFICER, MACHILIPATNAM, KRISHNA DISTRICT. 4. THE TAHSILDAR, MACHILIPATNAM, KRISHNA DISTRICT. 5. THUMALA CHERUVU GRAM PANCHAYAT, REP. BY ITS SECRETARY, THUMALA CHERUVU, MACHILIPATNAM, KRISHNA DISTRICT. ...RESPONDENT(S): Counsel for the Petitioner(S): 1. SAI GANGADHAR CHAMARTY Counsel for the Respondent(S): 1. GP FOR REVENUE (AP) 2. 3 HBKM,J W.P.No.7347 of 2020 The Court made the following Order: Heard the learned counsel for the petitioners, the learned Assistant Government Pleader for the respondent Nos.1 to 4 and the learned Standing Counsel for the 5th respondent. 2. This writ petition was filed questioning the action of the respondents in trying to assign the house site pattas under the Navaratnalu-Pedalandariki Illu program in the land in R.S.No.52/1 and 52/3 of Thumula Cheruvu, Hamlet of Kona Village, Machilipatnam, Krishna District, which was classified as Puntha without following the due process of law. 3. On the other hand, the learned Assistant Government Pleader relying upon the counter affidavit of the 5th respondent submits that the alternative land was proposed for the above said housing scheme and the subject land is not utilized for the above said purpose. 4. In view of the same, as the subject land is not utilized for the above said public purpose, no further orders are necessary in this writ petition. However, the respondent Nos.2 to 5 are directed to deal with the subject land in R.S.No.52/1 and 52/3 of Thumula Cheruvu, Hamlet of Kona Village, Machilipatnam, Krishna District, strictly in accordance with law, if so warranted for any public purpose. 5. Accordingly, this Writ Petition is disposed of. Interim order if any deemed to have been vacated. There shall be no order as to costs. 4 HBKM,J W.P.No.7347 of 2020 As a sequel, Interlocutory Applications pending, if any, shall stand closed. __________________________ JUSTICE B. KRISHNA MOHAN 23.09.2025 PGT