SHRILAL SON OF SHRI DHANNA v. CHOUTHILAL SON OF SHRI KISHANLAL
CW/12175/2025 · 2025-08-14
Sameer Jain
body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 45605 (RAJ) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 45605 (RAJ) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
[2025:RJ-JP:31742] HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR S.B. Civil Writ Petition No. 12175/2025
1. Shrilal Son Of Shri Dhanna, Resident Of Chahara (Chuli) Tehsil Gangapur City.
2. Kailash Son Of Shri Dhanna, Resident Of Chahara (Chuli) Tehsil Gangapur City.
3. Munshi Son Of Shri Dhanna, Resident Of Chahara (Chuli) Tehsil Gangapur City.
4. Phuloo Widow Of Shri Dhanna, Resident Of Chahara (Chuli) Tehsil Gangapur City.
5. Lallu Son Of Sukhlal, Resident Of Chahara (Chuli) Tehsil Gangapur City. ----Petitioners Versus
1. Chouthilal Son Of Shri Kishanlal, Resident Of Kolipada, Gangapur City.
2. Land Holder, Tehsildar Gangapur City.
3. Sub-Registrar, Through Tehsildar Gangapur City.
4. Khemchand Son Of Shri Jairam, Resident Of Village Bardkala, Tehsil Gangapur City.
5. Lakhanlal Son Of Kishor, Resident Of Gurjar Baroda, Tehsil And District Gangapur City. ----Respondents For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Ram Kumar Swami with Mr. Rakesh Swami For Respondent(s) : Mr. V.D. Gathola for respondent Nos.1-3 HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SAMEER JAIN
Judgment 14/08/2025 After arguing for a while, learned counsel for the petitioners has made a limited prayer seeking directions for early disposal of
[2025:RJ-JP:31742] (2 of 2) [CW-12175/2025] the appeal subjudice before the Divisional Commissioner number 56/2025.
Learned counsel has submitted that the purpose of filing an appeal will become otiose if not adjudicated in a timely manner. Moreover, with the passage of time prayers of the petitioners are getting frustrated. Upon directions of the Court, qua respondent Nos.1-3, appearance is marked by Mr. V.D. Gathola, and he has not opposed the prayer made for early disposal and has assured that Divisional Commissioner, in the interest of justice, will adjudicate the matter subjudice before it, pronto. In light of the assurance given by the learned counsel for the respondent, this Court without commenting anything on merits, directs concerned Divisional Commissioner to give audience to the petitioners and the respondent No.4 on 29.08.2025 at 11:00 AM and thereafter adjudicate the matter, within a period of three months. Petitioners are directed to mark appearance before the office of concerned Divisional Commissioner on the above stated date and time. Further, the petitioners are at liberty to contest qua the interim stay, if so chooses. With the aforesaid directions, the present petition is disposed of. Pending applications, if any, shall stand disposed.
(SAMEER JAIN),J DEEPAK/12