Smt. Kinnnera Aruna Kumari v. The State of Andhra Pradesh,
WP/3666/2021 · 2025-09-22
Venkata Jyothirmai Pratapa
body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 45603 (AP) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 45603 (AP) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
APHC010059632021
IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3396] TUESDAY,THE TWENTY THIRD DAY OF SEPTEMBER TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE DR JUSTICE VENKATA JYOTHIRMAI PRATAPA WRIT PETITION NO: 3666/2021 Between:
1. SMT. KINNNERA ARUNA KUMARI, W/O. KINNERA RAJU, AGED 37 YEARS, OCC. HOUSE HOLD R/O. KUNCHEPARTHI VILLAGE, VEMSUR MANDAL KHAMMAM DISTRICT
...PETITIONER AND
1. THE STATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH, REP. BY ITS PRL SL,RETARY, HOME DEPARTMENT SECRETARIAT, VELAGAPUDI, AMARAVATHI, GUNTUR DISTRICT
2. THE SUPERINTENDENT OF POLICE, KRISHNA DISTRICT AT MACHILIPATNAM
3. THE SUB INSPECTOR OF POLICE, REDDYGUDEM, REDDYGUDEM MANLIAL, KRISHNA DISTRICT. 4. KONDAPALLI KONDALA RAO, S/O. RAMA KOTAIAH, AGED 49 YEARS R/O. REDDYGUDEM, REDDYGUDEM MARIDAL KRISHNA DISTRICT
5. KONDAPALLI RAMAKRISHNA, S/O. KONDALA RAO, AGED 30 YEARS R/O. REDDYGUDEM, REDDYGURIEM MANDAL KRISHNA DISTRICT. ...RESPONDENT(S): Counsel for the Petitioner:
1. KONDAPALLI SYAM SUNDER Counsel for the Respondent(S):
1. GP FOR HOME The Court made the following: ORDER:
This Writ Petition is filed under Article 226 of Constitution of India with the following prayer for:
“.... to issue a Writ order or Direction more particularly one in the nature of Writ of Mandamuc, declaring the action of the 3rd respondent not providing Police Protection against the unofficial Respondents in connection with causes trespasses the petitioner land and damaged the Roof Shed and made theft valuable property of the petitioner and threatening the petitioner
2
with anti social elements and endanger to the petitioner life and limb in respect of the land RS no. 404/11 to an extent of Sq.532.4 yards situated at Reddygudem Village and Mandal, Krishna District, illegal, arbitrary and against the principles of natural justice and also violation of Articles 14, 19 and 21 of the Constitution of India and consequently to direct the respondent Police to provide Police Protection in favour of the petitioner herein with his own expenditure against the unofficial respondents in respect of the land.”
2. Today, when the matter is taken up for hearing, there is no representation on behalf of the petitioner. 3. Sri Md.Farooq, learned Assistant Government Pleader for Home, on written instructions, would submit that there are civil disputes pending between the parties. 4. For ready reference, the written instructions are extracted hereunder:
“It is submitted that, the Kinnera Aruna Kumari/petitioner herein did not filed any report or representation with Reddigudem Police Station relating to land vide Rs.No.404/11.”
5.
Recording the said submissions, the Writ Petition is disposed of. There shall be no order as to costs. As a sequel thereto, miscellaneous petitions, if any, pending shall stand closed. ________________________________________ Dr.JUSTICE VENKATA JYOTHIRMAI PRATAPA Date:23.09.2025 ASR
3
HON’BLE DR. JUSTICE VENKATA JYOTHIRMAI PRATAPA
W.P.No.3666 of 2021
Dt.23.09.2025
Asr