[3506 ] IN THE HIGH COURT OR/^NDHRA PRADESH :: AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) TUESDAY ,THE SIXTH DAY OF MAY TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE CHALLA GUNARANJAN WRIT PETITION NO: 11828 OF 2025 Between: T.Roseleela, W/o Prasad, Aged 50 Years, Occ.A.P.O, O/o M.P.D.O, Bestavaripeta Mandal, PraKasam District, R/o Vadimadugu, Prakasam Distrtict ...PETITIONER j AND 1. The^state of AP, Rep by its Principal Secretary, Panchayat Raj Rural Development, AP Secretariat Buildings, Velagapudi, Amaravathi, Guntur District. 2. The Society for Rural Deveippment Services Rep by its Commissioner, Rural Development,TadepaHii Guntur District. 3. The District Collector, Prakasam District. 4. The Project Director, District Water Management Agency, District. 5. The Project Director, District Water Management Agency, Eluru District. ...RESPONDENTS and Prakasam / Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India is filed praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased to issue a writ, Order or Direction more particularly in the nature of writ of Mandamus to Declare the inaction of the one Respondents Nos. 1 and 2 on my representation Dated 7-4-2025 as illegal arbitrary and Consequently direct the Respondent No.2 to issue all consequential benefits to the Petitioner for the period of termination to reinstatement. lA NO: 1 OF 2025 Petition under Section 151 CPC is filed praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to Direct the respondents nos.1 and 2 to dispose of the representation Dt:07.04.2025r Counsel for the Petitioner<s):SRIv1VIANUBROLU SRINIVASA RAO Counsel for the Respondents: GP FOR SERVICES I Counsel for the Respondents: GP FOR REVENUE Counsel for the Respondents: SRI MSSR MURTHY, SC FOR WATER management The Court made the following )■ APHC010203842025 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3506] TUESDAY ,THE SIXTH DAY OF MAY TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE CHALLA GUNARANJAN WRIT PETITION NO: 11828/2025 Between: T.roseleela, ...PETITIONER AND The State Of Ap and Others ...RESPONDENT(S) Counsel for the Petitioner: 1.MANUBROLU SRINIVASA RAO Counsel for the Respondent(S): 1.GP FOR SERVICES I 1 The Court made the following: ORDER: The present Writ Petition is filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India for the following relief/s;- . .to issue an order or writ or direction more particularly one in the nature of writ of Mandamus to Declare the inaction of the Respondents Nos.1 and 2 on my representation Dated 7.4.2025 as illegal arbitrary and Consequently direct the Respondent No. 2 to Issue all consequential benefits to the Petitioner for the period of termination to reinstatement and pass such other order or orders....” Heard Sri Manubolu Srinivas, learned counsel for petitioner, Sri M.S.R.Chandra Murthy, learned Standing Counsel and learned Assistant Government Pleader for Services-I for respondents. 2. 3. Petitioner was appointed as APO by respondent No.3 as Fixed Tenure Employee on contract basis. On the allegation of dereliction of duties terminated from services he was 30.03.2011. Challenging the same, petitioner on preferrecTappeal before respondent No.2, resulting in dismissal by order dated 17.08.20211. Aggrieved by the same, petitioner filed W.P.No.27193 of 2011, which came to be disposed by this Court by order dated 06.03.2022 directing the respondents to conduct fresh enquiry. In pursuance to fresh enquiry, petitioner was exonerated from allegations and came to be reinstated as APO \ \ at Musunuru Mandal, Eluru District, by order dated 03.08.2023. As petitioner has not been paid the benefits from the period of termination till reinstatement, he made representation dated 25.02.2025 received by respondent Nos.1 & 2 on 07.04.2025 which is stated to be pending. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that it would suffice to direct respondent Nos.1 & 2 to dispose of the aforesaid representation. 4. Sri M.S.R.Chandra Murthy, learned Standing Counsel appearing for respondents submits that the representation of the petitioner would be disposed in accordance with law. 5. In view of the aforesaid submission, without expressing any opinion on the merits of the matter, with the consent of both the learned counsel, writ petition is disposed of directing the respondent Nos.1 & 2 to pass appropriate orders in pursuance of petitioners representation dated 07.04.2025 by passing speaking order within a period of six (06) weeks from the date of receipt of a copy of this order. 6. 7. Accordingly, the Writ Petition stands disposed of. There shall be order as to costs. no As'-a sequel, miscellaneous applications, pending if any, shall stand closed. Sd/- P VINOD KUMAR ASSISTANT REGISTRAR //TRUE COPY// SECTION OFFICER To 1. The Principal Secretary, Panchayat Raj and Rural Development, State of AP, AP Secretariat Buildings, Velagapudi, Amaravathi, Guntur District 2. The Society for Rural Development Services Rep by its Commissioner, Rural Development, Tadepalli, Guntur District. 3. The District Collector, Prakasam District. 4. The Project Director, District Water Management Agency, Prakasam District. 5. The Project Director, District Water Management Agency, Eluru District. 6. One CC to SRI. MANUBROLU SRINIVASA RAO Advocate [OPUC] 7. One CC to SRI MSSR MURTHY, SC FOR WATER MANAGEMENT [OPUC] 8. Two CCs to GP FOR SERVICES I ,High Court Of Andhra Pradesh. [OUT] 9. Two CCs to GP FOR REVENUE,High Court Of Andhra Pradesh. [OUT] Three CD Copies 10. HIGH COURT DATED:06/05/2025 ORDER I 0 5 AUG 20?5 2 Current Snciwn . ^ WP.No.11828 of 2025 THE WRIT PETITION IS DISPOSED OF WITHOUT COSTS