Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Karnataka · body

2025 DAILYLAW 45596 (KAR)

SRI D KRISHNAKUMAR v. THE STATE OF KARNATAKA

WP/28703/2024 · 2025-02-24

K S Hemalekha

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

- 1 - NC: 2025:KHC:8224 WP No. 28703 of 2024 IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 24TH DAY OF FEBRUARY, 2025 BEFORE THE HON'BLE MRS JUSTICE K.S. HEMALEKHA WRIT PETITION NO. 28703 OF 2024 (CS-RES) BETWEEN: SRI. D. KRISHNAKUMAR S/O LATE DASEGOWDA AGED 64 YEARS PRESIDENT/DIRECTOR ALAPANAGUDDE MILK PRODUCERS CO-OPERATIVE SOCIETY, YEDIYUR HOBLI, KUNIGAL TALUK ALSO AT KANNAGUNI, YADIYUR HOBLI KUNIGAL TALUK, TUMKUR - 572 130. …PETITIONER (BY SRI. MAHAMAD TAHIR A, ADVOCATE) AND: 1. THE STATE OF KARNATAKA DEPARTMENT OF CO-OPERATION VIDHANA SOUDHA, BANGALORE - 560 001, REPRESENTED BY ITS PRINCIPAL SECRETARY. 2. THE ASSISTANT REGISTRAR OF CO-OPERATIVE SOCIETIES, TUMKUR SUB DIVISION, TUMKUR - 572 107. 3. THE TUMKUR DISTRICT CO-OPERATIVE MILK PRODUCERS UNION, NH-206, B H ROAD, MALLASANDRA, Digitally signed by MAHALAKSHMI B M Location: HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA - 2 - NC: 2025:KHC:8224 WP No. 28703 of 2024 TUMKUR - 572 130 REPRESENTED BY ITS CEO, REGISTER UNDER KARNATAKA REGISTERED UNDER KARNATAKA SOCIETIES REGISTERED ACT, 1959. 4. THE DEPUTY COMMISSIONER, TUMKUR DISTRICT, TUMKUR - 572 107, AND ALSO DISTRICT ELECTION OFFICER, TUMAKURU. 5. THE CO-OPERATIVE DEVELOPMENT OFFICER KUNIGAL TALUK, TAPCMS BUILDING, KUNIGAL TALUK, TUMKUR DISTRICT - 572 107. …RESPONDENTS (BY SRI. YOGESH D. NAIK, AGA FOR R1, R2, R4 AND R5; SRI. A.C. BALARAJ, ADVOCATE FOR R3) THIS W.P. IS FILED UNDER ARTICLES 226 AND 227 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA PRAYING TO QUASH THE NOTICE DATED 22.10.2024 BEARING NO.SANI32/DAVE KALAM29(C)/CR-12-2024.25 PASSED BY R-2 VIDE ANNX-G AND ETC. THIS PETITION, COMING ON FOR PRELIMINARY HEARING 'B' GROUP, THIS DAY, ORDER WAS MADE THEREIN AS UNDER: CORAM: HON'BLE MRS JUSTICE K.S. HEMALEKHA - 3 - NC: 2025:KHC:8224 WP No. 28703 of 2024 ORAL ORDER Learned counsel for the petitioner files memo, which reads as under: "The counsel for the petitioner submits that the captioned petitions have become infructuous as the respondent has passed an order dated 31.12.2025 dropping the allegation made in the impugned notice. Hence the matter may be disposed off as having become infructuous." 2. Memo is taken on record. 3. In view of memo, the writ petition stands dismissed as having become infructuous. Sd/- ____________________ JUSTICE K.S. HEMALEKHA AT List No.: 1 Sl No.: 0 CT: BHK