Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Andhra Pradesh · body

2025 DAILYLAW 45590 (AP)

SMT N KAROL KANTHAMMA v. THE STATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH

WP/15808/2021 · 2025-09-22

Venkata Jyothirmai Pratapa

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

APHC010272742021 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3396] TUESDAY, THE TWENTY THIRD DAY OF SEPTEMBER TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE DR JUSTICE VENKATA JYOTHIRMAI PRATAPA WRIT PETITION NO: 15808/2021 Between: 1. SMT N KAROL KANTHAMMA, SMT N KAROL KANTHAMMA W/O. LATE JAYAKAR AGED 67 YEARS, OCC RETIRED EMPLOYEE, R/O.1-47-1, STANTANPURAM,BALAJI NAGAR, KURNOOL, KURNOOL DISTRICT. ...PETITIONER AND 1. THE STATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH, STATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH REP BY ITS PRINCIPAL SECRETARY TO GOVERNMENT, HOME DEPARTMENT, SECRETARIAT, VELAGAPUDI, GUNTUR DISTRICT. 2. SUPERINTENDENT OF POLICE, SUPERINTENDENT OF POLICE, KURNOOL, KURNOOL DISTRICT. 3. STATION HOUSE OFFICER, STATION HOUSE OFFICER, KURNOOL III TOWN POLICE STAITON, KURNOOL, KURNOOL DISTRICT. ...RESPONDENT(S): Counsel for the Petitioner: 1. SRINIVASULU KURRA Counsel for the Respondent(S): 1. GP FOR HOME The Court made the following: ORDER: This Writ Petition is filed under Article 226 of Constitution of India with the following prayer for: “.... to issue a Writ/Order/Direction more particularly one in the nature of Writ of Mandamus declaring the action of the Respondents in not commencing and concluding the investigation in Crime in FIR No.236/2021 on the file of the SHO, III Town Police Station, Kurnool as illegal, arbitrary, without jurisdiction besides violation of Art.14 of the Constitution of India and consequently direct the Respondents to complete the investigation in Crime in FIR No.236/2021 on the file of the SHO, III Town Police Station, Kurnool forthwith.” 2 2. Sri Md.Farooq, learned Assistant Government Pleader for Home, on instructions, would submit that the police have completed the investigation in this matter and the case is referred as false. 3. Recording the said submission, the Writ Petition is disposed of. There shall be no order as to costs. As a sequel thereto, miscellaneous petitions, if any, pending shall stand closed. ________________________________________ Dr.JUSTICE VENKATA JYOTHIRMAI PRATAPA Date:23.09.2025 Asr 3 HON’BLE DR. JUSTICE VENKATA JYOTHIRMAI PRATAPA W.P.No.15808 of 2021 Dt.23.09.2025 Asr