SHRI DHONDIRAM S/O MARUTI BHOSALE v. THE DEPUTY COMMISSIONER
WP/62088/2010 · 2025-01-29
Suraj Govindaraj
body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 4559 (KAR) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 4559 (KAR) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
- 1 -
NC: 2025:KHC-D:1750 WP No. 62088 of 2010
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA, DHARWAD BENCH DATED THIS THE 29TH DAY OF JANUARY, 2025 BEFORE THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SURAJ GOVINDARAJ WRIT PETITION NO. 62088 OF 2010 (KLR-RR/SUR) BETWEEN:
1. SHRI DHONDIRAM S/O. MARUTI BHOSALE, AGE: 64 YEARS, OCC: AGRICULTURE, R/O. DHONEWADI, TAL: CHIKKODI, DIST: BELGAUM. 2. SMT. SHANTABAI APPASO TALAVEKAR, AGE: 64 YEARS, OCC: AGRICULTURE, R/O. GALATGA, TAL: CHIKODI, DIST: BELGAUM. …PETITIONERS (BY SRI. RAVIRAJ C. PATIL, ADVOCATE) AND:
1. THE DEPUTY COMMISSIONER, BELGAUM, DIST: BELGAUM. 2. THE ASSISTANT COMMISSIONER, CHIKODI DIVISION, CHIKODI. 3. THE DEPUTY TAHASHILDAR, SADALGA, TAL: CHIKODI, DIST: BELGAUM. 4. SHRI. BALESHA SIDDU GAVDE, AGE: 39 YEARS, OCC: AGRICULTURE, R/O. KARADGA, TAL: CHIKODI, DIST: BELGAUM. 5. SHRI. KALLAPPA SHIDDU GAVDE, AGE: 34 YEARS, OCC: AGRICULTURE, R/O. KARADGA, TAL: CHIKODI, DIST: BELGAUM. 6. SMT. TARABAI BHAVUSO PATIL, AGE: 69 YEARS, OCC: AGRICULTURE,
GIRIJA A BYAHATTI Location: HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA DHARWAD BENCH
- 2 -
NC: 2025:KHC-D:1750 WP No. 62088 of 2010
R/O. NERLI, TAL: KARVEER, DIST: KOLHAPUR. 7. SMT. BHAGIRATI NIVARUTTI SHINDE, AGE: 62 YEARS, OCC: HOUSEHOLD WORK, R/O. RUVI, TAL: HATKANAGALA, DIST: KOLHAPUR. …RESPONDENTS (BY SRI. M.M. KHANNUR, AGA FOR R1-R3;
SRI. B.S. KAMATE, ADVOCATE FOR R4-R5;
R6-R7 SERVED)
THIS WRIT PETITION IS FILED UNDER ARTICLES 226 AND 227 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA PRAYING TO ISSUE A WRIT OF CERTIORARI OR ANY OTHER APPROPRIATE WRIT OR DIRECTION AND SET ASIDE THE CONFIRMATION ORDER PASSED BY THE 1ST RESPONDENT IN NO.RB.RTA.77/2007-2008 DATED:16/07/2009 PRODUCED AT ANNEXURE-A AND ALSO CONFIRM THE ORDER PASSED BY THE 2ND RESPONDENT IN R.T.S./AP/302/05-06 DATED:19/02/2007 AT ANNEXURE-B, THERE BY CANCEL THE M.R.NO.449 AND ETC. THIS PETITION COMING ON FOR ORDERS THIS DAY, ORDER WAS MADE THEREIN AS UNDER:
ORAL ORDER
(PER: THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SURAJ GOVINDARAJ)
1. The petitioners are before this Court seeking for the following reliefs: a) Set aside the confirmation order passed by the First Respondent in No.RB.RTA.77/2007-2008 dated:16/07/2009 produced at Annexure-A and also confirm the order passed by the 2nd respondent in R.T.S./AP/302/05-06 dated: 19/02/2007 at Annexure-B, there by cancel the M.R.No.449. b) Pass any such order which this Hon’ble Tribunal deems fit in the circumstances of the case. - 3 -
NC: 2025:KHC-D:1750 WP No. 62088 of 2010
2. Despite the order dated 07.01.2025, none appears for the petitioners today also.
The application to bring the legal representatives of deceased petitioner No.1 on record has also not been filed. It appears that the petitioners are not interested in prosecuting the matter. 3. Hence, the petition is dismissed for non-prosecution. Sd/- (SURAJ GOVINDARAJ) JUDGE
gab CT-MCK List No.: 1 Sl No.: 5