923 wp 813-2025.odt 1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY NAGPUR BENCH AT NAGPUR WRIT PETITION NO. 813/2025 Ashish Shrikrushnarao Gohathre Vs. Education Officer (Primary), Zilla Parishad, Amravati and another - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - --- - Office Notes, Office Memoranda of Coram, Court's or Judge's orders appearances, Court's orders or directions and Registrar's orders - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - ----- ------------ - Shri K.P. Mahalle, Advocate for petitioner Shri M.G. Rathi, Advocate for respondent No.1 Shri S.Y. Rawate, Advocate h/f Shri S.M. Vaishnav, Advocate for respondent Nos.2 and 3 CORAM : N.W. SAMBRE AND SACHIN.S. DESHMUKH, JJ.. DATE : 01.07.2025 Learned Counsel for respondent Nos.2 and 3, on instructions, states that the proposal for grant of regular approval in favour of the petitioner shall be submitted to respondent No.1 within two weeks from today, which shall be complete in all respect. 2. The statement is accepted as an undertaking to this Court. Once the proposal is submitted to respondent No.1, we direct respondent No.1 to decide the same expeditiously and, in any case, within a period of four weeks from the date of receipt of such proposal as we are informed that petitioner is working with respondent since 2010. 3. Considering the fact that the petitioner’s services are not disputed by respondent Nos.2 and 3, there shall be 923 wp 813-2025.odt 2 no coercive action against the petitioner without following due process of law. 4. The Writ Petition is disposed of accordingly. No costs. (SACHIN S. DESHMUKH, J.) (N.W. SAMBRE, J.) R.S. Sahare