Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Punjab and Haryana · body

2025 DAILYLAW 45577 (PNJ)

BARINDER SINGH v. STATE OF PUNJAB AND OTHERS

CWP/10760/2025 · 2025-04-21

Aman Chaudhary

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB & HARYANA AT 137 Barinder Singh State of Punjab CORAM: HON Present : AMAN CHAUDHARY, J. (ORAL) 1. respondents to consider the petitioner for promotion to the post of Labour Inspector Grade promoted. 2. raised in the present petition P-19, has been served upon the respondents, which has yet not evoked any response. He, on instructions, prays that a direction may be given to the respondents to decid State counsel has no objection. 3. merits of the case, this petition is hereby disposed of with a direction to IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB & HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH Barinder Singh Versus f Punjab and Others CORAM: HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE AMAN CHAUDHARY Mr. T.S.Chauhan, Advocate and Mr. Karanpreet Singh, Advocate, for the petitioner. Mr. Arun Gupta, DAG, Punjab. AMAN CHAUDHARY, J. (ORAL) Prayer made in the present case is for directing the respondents to consider the petitioner for promotion to the post of Labour Inspector Grade-I, w.e.f. 04.04.2022 i.e. from the date his juniors were Learned counsel would contend that regar raised in the present petition, a legal notice dated has been served upon the respondents, which has yet not evoked any response. He, on instructions, prays that a direction may be given to the respondents to decide the same in a time bound manner, to which learned State counsel has no objection. In view of the above and without commenting upon the merits of the case, this petition is hereby disposed of with a direction to IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB & HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH CWP-10760-2025 (O & M) Date of decision: 21.04.2025 ....Petitioner ...Respondents JUSTICE AMAN CHAUDHARY . T.S.Chauhan, Advocate and Advocate, Mr. Arun Gupta, DAG, Punjab. Prayer made in the present case is for directing the respondents to consider the petitioner for promotion to the post of Labour 04.04.2022 i.e. from the date his juniors were Learned counsel would contend that regarding the claim , a legal notice dated 23.05.2024, Annexure has been served upon the respondents, which has yet not evoked any response. He, on instructions, prays that a direction may be given to the e the same in a time bound manner, to which learned In view of the above and without commenting upon the merits of the case, this petition is hereby disposed of with a direction to PARVEEN KUMAR 2025.04.21 17:55 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this order/judgment. CWP-10760-2025 -2- the respondents to decide the legal notice dated 23.05.2024, within a period of 6 months, which this Court has no reason to believe the authorities would not address in a just, fair and reasonable manner. Upon doing so, after notice and hearing offered to him and if found entitled, grant the benefit forthwith. Needless to say, if the orders are adverse to his interest, the same shall contain reasons and the petitioner shall be free to seek legal redress thereupon. 21.04.2025 (AMAN CHAUDHARY) parveen kumar JUDGE Whether speaking/reasoned : Yes / No Whether reportable : Yes / No PARVEEN KUMAR 2025.04.21 17:55 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this order/judgment.