[2025:RJ-JP:46996] HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR S.B. Criminal Appeal (Sb) No. 2610/2025 Pooran S/o Panchulal @ Panchuram, R/o Leela Waali Dhani Tan Khatkar, Police Thana Ajeetgarh, District Neem Ka Thana At Present District Sikar (Raj.) (At Present Confined At District Jail Bundi) ----Appellant Versus 1. The State of Rajasthan, Through The P.P. 2. Akash S/o Nemlal, Aged About 19 Years, R/o Kaidara Ki Jhopriya Kerwar, Bundi, Rajasthan. ----Respondents For Appellant(s) : Ms. Harshita Sharma for Dr. Mahesh Sharma For Respondent(s) : Mr. Devi Singh, PP HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE CHANDRA PRAKASH SHRIMALI Order 20/11/2025 1. Learned Public Prosecutor has apprised this Court that compliance of Section 15-A (3) of the Scheduled Castes and the Schedule Tribes (Prevention of Atrocities) Act, 1989 (for short ‘’the Act of 1989’’) has been made in the present case. 2. The present criminal appeal under Section 14-A(2) of the Scheduled Castes & the Scheduled Tribes (Prevention of Atrocities) Act has been filed in connection with FIR No.127/2024 registered at Police Station Karvar, District Bundi for the offence under Section(s) 364-A, 395, 327 & 120-B of IPC and Section(s) 3(2)(v) & 3(2)(va) of SC & ST (Prevention of Atrocities) Act, 1989. 3. It is contended by learned counsel for the appellant that he is innocent and he has falsely been implicated in this case. He also submit that accused-appellant has been in judicial custody since long and the conclusion of the trial will take long time, hence the appellant may be enlarged on bail. [2025:RJ-JP:46996] (2 of 2) [CRLAS-2610/2025] 4. Learned Public Prosecutor appearing for the State has vehemently opposed the appeal. 5. Taking into consideration the submissions advanced by learned counsel for the appellant and overall facts and circumstances of this case and especially the fact that the co- accused persons in S.B. Criminal Appeal No.1273/2024 & other connected matters titled as Anil Kumar Nitharwal and Ors., vs. State of Rajasthan have already been enlarged on bail by a co- ordinate Bench of this Court vide order dated 02.09.2024, and also the fact that the case of the present appellant is similar to that of other co-accused. Thus, without expressing any opinion on the merits of the case, this court deems it just and proper to enlarge the appellant on bail. 6. The order dated 09.09.2025 passed by the learned Special Judge, SC/ST (Prevention of Atrocities Cases), Bundi is quashed and set-aside and this appeal is accordingly allowed. It is directed that accused appellant Pooran S/o Panchulal @ Panchuram shall be released on bail provided he furnishes a personal bond in the sum of Rs.1,00,000/- (Rupees One Lac Only) together with two sureties in the sum of Rs.50,000/- (Rupees Fifty Thousand Only) each to the satisfaction of the learned Trial Court with the stipulation that he shall appear before that Court and any Court to which the matter is transferred, on all subsequent dates of hearing and as and when called upon to do so and shall comply with all the conditions laid down under Section 437(3) Cr.P.C. (CHANDRA PRAKASH SHRIMALI),J GAURAV SHARMA /199