VEMURI VENKATESWARA RAO v. THE STATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH
WP/3644/2022 · 2025-10-14
Venkata Jyothirmai Pratapa
body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 45571 (AP) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 45571 (AP) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
APHC010056222022
IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3396] WEDNESDAY,THE FIFTEENTH DAY OF OCTOBER TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT
THE HONOURABLE DR JUSTICE VENKATA JYOTHIRMAI PRATAPA
WRIT PETITION No. 3644/2022 Between:
1. VEMURI VENKATESWARA RAO, S/O.KASIVISWANADHAM, HINDU, AGED ABOUTBYEARS, OCC CULTIVATION, RESIDENT OF DOOR NO.117/1, RAMANAGARAM, LAKSHMI NAGARAM, CHALLAPALLI MANDAL, KRISHNA DISTRICT
2. VEMURI PADMA, W/O. VENKATESWARA RAO HINDU, AGED ABOUT 42 YEARS, OCC CULTIVATION RESIDENT OF DOOR NO.117/1, RAMANAGARAM, LAKSHMI NAGARAM, CHALLAPALLI MANDAL, KRISHNA DISTRICT
3. VEMURI RAKESH CHOWDARY, S/O.VENKATESWARA RAO HINDU, AGED ABOUT 21 YEARS, OCC CULTIVATION, RESIDENT OF DOOR NO.117/1, RAMANAGARAM, LAKSHMI NAGARAM, CHALLAPALLI MANDAL, KRISHNA DISTRICT
4. VEMURI TEJA, S/O.VENKATESWARA RAO HINDU, AGED ABOUT 20 YEARS, OCC CULTIVATION PETITIONERS 1 TO 4 ARE RESIDENT OF DOOR NO.117/1, RAMANAGARAM, LAKSHMI NAGARAM, CHALLAPALLI MANDAL, KRISHNA DISTRICT
...PETITIONER(S) AND
1. THE STATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH, REP BY ITS PRINCIPAL SECRETARY, HOME DEPARTMENT, SECRETARIAT BLDGS, AMARAVATI. 2. THE SUPERINTENDENT OF POLICE, KRISHNA DISTRICT AT MACHILIPATNAM. 3. THE STATION HOUSE OFFICER, CHALLAPALLI POLICE STATION, KRISHNA DISTRICT. 4. KOLLURI KOTESWARA RAO, S/O. GOPALAM, AGED 55 YEARS, SARPANCH, RAMA NAGARAM, LAKSHMIPURAM, CHALLAPALLI MANDAL,KRISHNA DISTRICT
5. UPPALA SRINU, S/O. RAMA MOHANA RAO, AGED 40 YEARS, TRACTOR DRIVER, RAMA NAGARAM, LAKSHMIPURAM, CHALLAPALLI MANDAL, KRISHNA DISTRICT
6. UPPALA SAI, S/O. SRINIVAS, AGED 20 YEARS, CULTIVATION,
2
RAMA NAGARAM, LAKSHMIPURAM, CHALLAPALLI MANDAL, KRISHNA DISTRICT
7. C H SATYANARAYANA, TRACTOR OWNER, PUCHAGADDA VILLAGE, CHALLAPALLI MANDAL, KRISHNA DISTRICT
8. KOLLURI SANNI, S/O. KOESWARARAO, . HINDU, CULTIVATION ET BUSINESS, RAMA NAGARAM, LAKSHMIPURAM, CHALLAPALLI MANDAL,KRISHNA DISTRICT
9.
KOLLURI MARRY KARUNA, W/O. KOTESWARA RAO, AGED 40 YEARS, RAMA NAGARAM, LAKSHMIPURAM, CHALLAPALLI MANDAL,KRISHNA DISTRICT
...RESPONDENT(S): Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased to issue a writ order or direction more particularly one in the nature of writ of Mandamus declaring the inaction on the part of the respondents 2 and 3 in taking effective steps against the respondents No.4 to 9 even and in spite of committing offences punishable under Sections 447, 341, 323, 384 r/w. 34 of IPC in spite of registering the FIR 355/2021 against them is illegal, arbitrary, capricious and violative of petitioner's constitution rights and consequently direct the respondents 2 8 3 to take effective and appropriate legal action against the unofficial respondents preventing them from entering into the property of the petitioners i.e, an extent of Ac. 2.17 cents of agricultural land situated in RS.No.447/1, 447/4, 448/7of Vakalagadda Village of challapalli Mandal, Krishna District and to pass IA NO: 1 OF 2022 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to direct the respondents 2 and 3 to take steps for recovering three soverns of Gold Chain which was snatched by the unofficial respondents on 5.12.2021 as stated in Report in FIR No. 355/2021 and to pass Counsel for the Petitioner(S):
1. YALLABANDI RAMATIRTHA Counsel for the Respondent(S):
1. GP FOR HOME
2. THADIKONDA KOTESHWARA PRASAD
3
The Court made the following:
ORDER:
This Writ Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India is filed by the Petitioners, seeking the following relief:
< ... to issue a writ order or direction more particularly one in the nature of writ of Mandamus declaring the inaction on the part of the respondents 2 and 3 in taking effective steps against the respondents No.4 to 9 even and in spite of committing offences punishable under Sections 447, 341, 323, 384 r/w. 34 of IPC in spite of registering the FIR 355/2021 against them is illegal, arbitrary, capricious and violative of petitioner's constitution rights and consequently direct the respondents 2 8 3 to take effective and appropriate legal action against the unofficial respondents preventing them from entering into the property of the petitioners i.e, an extent of Ac. 2.17 cents of agricultural land situated in RS.No.447/1, 447/4, 448/7of Vakalagadda Village of Challapalli Mandal, Krishna District and to pass ...=
At the time of hearing, learned Assistant Government Pleader for Home on written instructions, would submit that investigation is completed and filed report is yet to be filed.
Learned counsel for the petitioners would submit that recording the said submission, this Writ Petition may be disposed of.
In that view, this Writ Petition is disposed of. Respondent Police are
directed to file the final report with regard to the subject crime within a period of two months from the date of receipt of a copy of this Order, if not filed so far. No order as to costs.
Pending applications, if any, shall stand closed.
DR.JUSTICE VENKATA JYOTHIRMAI PRATAPA Mjl/*
4
HON’BLE DR. JUSTICE VENKATA JYOTHIRMAI PRATAPA
Writ Petition No. 3644 of 2022
15.10.2025
Mjl /*