c TUESDAY, THE ^ivtu TWO thousand ™ ■• AMARAV>Vrf day of May and twenty five present the HON'BLE the the HON’BLE SRI WRIT PFTi-p^-^fj chief justice SRI CHIRAJ SINGH THAKUR CHEEIHALAPATI homisssof^s AND JUSTICE RAVI Between; T M/s HDFC Authorlsec Officer, Limited, amglayam Junction, A V Ann Pradesh, ’ Apparao Road, 2. M/s HDFC I ifo I Regional Manager limited., r Marg, Mada,a.sd:'i, mZITmZX'° Represented by Chalumuru , Bajamahendravaram its Complex, > Andhra ^Represented by Mills Compound, Its ra. ■PETITIONERS AND 1. The Andhra Pradesh State Pnn SrjatSwat Angara Venkata 37 years, Occ; Palagani Village Lakshi, W/o Late House wife. Undrajavaram '■ Wg District 534216 Aged Bridge, Andhra Pradesh. Angara Samson ^7 years, Occ; Palagani Village Ravi Kumar, Hindu, ' T B C Colony, Near Wg District 534216 Aged 19 Andhra Pradesh. Rout" - Hndrajavaram, VV G Remar, Hindu,Aged Bridge Pradesh. ft 5. Angara LakshmiKanaka Durga, W/o Sri Madhava Rao Hindu Aqed- 6. Angara Madhava Rao, S/o Sri Appa Rao, Hindu, Aged: not none Occ BiG ' °°°'' '^° 40-1-50/1, Upstairs, of 520004Krishna°Ksiricr Vijayawada Rurai, ...RESPONDENTS Petition under Articie 226 of the Constitution that in the circumstances stated i Of India is filed praying in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased to issue an order, direction of a Certiorari, a. By calling for the records 2024 in FA No. 377 of 2024 dated or Writ more in the nature pertaining to FA lA No 655 of 17-12-2024 passed by the Hon'ble ■ b. Consequently, allow the lA NO. of 109 days and directing the on merits, c. To award costs of the 1st respondent and set aside the same 655/2024 by condoning the delay respondent to hear the appeal petition. 1st writ lA NO: 1 OF 207.*; Petition under Section 151 CPC circumstances stated in the affidavit filed i Court may be pleased to stay all further proceedings In pursuance to the award/ order passed in CC No. 51 of 2021 before the Consumer disputes Redressal Commission. is filed praying that in the in support of the petition, the High Hon'ble District. Counsel for the Petitioner: M/S. CH VEDA VANI REPRESENTING SRI T P RAVI SHANKER Counsel for the Respondents:— The Court made the following: ORDER ' "T APHC010190822025 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA at amaravati WRIT PETITION NO: 11559 of 2025 M/s. HDFC Life Insurance Company Limited PRADESH Bench Sr.No:-33 [3483] 03? and another ■ ••Petitioners Vs. The Andhra Pradesh State Consumer Commission and others Disputes Redressal ■•■Respondents ********** Advocate for Petitioners Mrs. Ch. Veda Vani appeared vice Mr. T. P. Ravi Shanker Advocate for Respondents CORAM :THE CHIEF JUSTICE DHIRAJ SINGH THAKUR SRI JUSTICE RAVI CHEEMALAPATI : 6th May 2025 DATE PC : The present petition has been filed challenging the order State Consumer Disputes at Vijayawada, whereby the application condonation of delay in preferring the appeal against the order of the Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission dated 17.12.2024 passed by the Andhra Pradesh Redressal Commission seeking District was dismissed. 2. It appears that there a delay of 109 days in preferring the Disputes Redressal Commission by Company Limited/petitioners on the ground that the petitioners had was appeal before the State Consumer M/s. HDFC Life Insurance application was dismissed the herein. The failed to 2 HCJ & RCJ W.P.No.11559 of 2025 show any cause much less sufficient cause, which would justify the condonation of 109 days in preferring the appeal. We have gone through the application filed by the petitioners 3. herein with a view to understand the averments made by the petitioners to justify the delay. On a perusal of the application, we are convinced that the view 4. expressed by the State Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission requires no interference inasmuch as the petitioner in the application had miserably failed to give any inkling regarding the date of knowledge of the order impugned and the consequent delay. We find no perversity in the order impugned. 5. 6. The present petition is found to be without any merit and is accordingly, dismissed. No costs. Consequently, connected miscellaneous applications, if any, shall stand closed. Sd/- K. TATA RAO DEPUTY REGISTRAR //TRUE COPY// SECTION OFFICER To, 1. One CC to Sri T P Ravi Shanker Advocate [OPUC] 2. Three CD Copies TF HIGH COURT DATED:06/05/2025 ORDER WP.No.11559 of 2025 DISMISSING THE W.P., WITHOUT COSTS