[2025:RJ-JP:47224] HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR S.B. Criminal Miscellaneous (Petition) No. 7102/2025 Vijay Laxmi W/o Rishabh, Aged About 65 Years, R/o Near Nitharbalo Ka Petrol Pump, Hindaun City, District Karauli, Rajasthan. ----Petitioner Versus 1. State Of Rajasthan, Through Pp 2. Umesh Kumar @ Gore Lal, S/o Shri Vishnu Prasad, Aged About 42 Years, R/o Keshavpura, Hindaun City, District Karauli. 3. Subhash Singh S/o Balbeer Singh, Aged About 46 Years, R/o Bhartiya Colony, Behind New Mandi, Hindaun City, District Karauli. 4. Dinesh Kumar S/o Sinua Ram, Aged About 45 Years, R/o Jyoti Colony, Hindaun City, District Karauli. 5. Rajendra Sharma S/o Ramdayal, Aged About 64 Years, R/o Krishna Colony, Hindaun City, District Karauli. 6. Pankaj Sharma S/o Dwarika Prasad, Aged About 45 Years, R/o Hindaun City, District Karauli ----Respondents For Petitioner(s) : Mr.Y.K. Sharma For Respondent(s) : Mr.Amit Punia, PP JUSTICE ANOOP KUMAR DHAND Order 21/11/2025 1. The instant misc. petition has been preferred by the petitioner seeking directions for fair, proper and impartial investigation in F.I.R. No.310/2025 registered at Police Station New Mandi, Hindaun City, District Karauli. 2. As per the pleadings of the misc. petition that the F.I.R. was registered against the accused person on 21.06.2025, but the [2025:RJ-JP:47224] (2 of 2) [CRLMP-7102/2025] Police is not proceeding in a fair and proper manner, so appropriate directions be issued to the Investigating Officer for conducting a fair and impartial investigation. 3. Per contra, learned Public Prosecutor opposes the prayer and submits that the matter is still at investigation stage and it will take its own time & motion, therefore, directions sought for should not be granted. 4. Looking to the fact that the F.I.R. has been registered in the month of June, 2025, this Court is of the view that the petitioner is at liberty to move an application under Section 200 Cr.P.C., in pursuance of the directions issued by the Hon’ble Apex Court in the case of Sakiri Vasu Vs. State of U.P. & Others reported in 2008 (2) SCC 409, before the Court concerned to get the status report of the investigation. 5. In case, any application, as mentioned above, is submitted by the petitioner before the trial court, appropriate orders shall be passed by the Court concerned strictly in accordance with law. 6. With the aforesaid observations, the instant criminal misc. petition stands disposed of. Stay application and all applications (pending, if any) also stand disposed of. (ANOOP KUMAR DHAND),J Aayush Sharma /103