Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Rajasthan · body

2025 DAILYLAW 45554 (RAJ)

SARANAM SINGH v. ADDI DISTRICT JUDGE FAST TRRAC

CW/10413/2008 · 2025-11-28

Bipin Gupta

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

[2025:RJ-JP:48575] HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR S.B. Civil Writ Petition No. 10413/2008 Sarnam Singh Son Of Shri Shree Lal, Village Gher,tehsil And District Dholpurraj. ----Petitioner Versus 1. Additional District Judge Fast Track No. 1, Dholpur Raj. 2. Bhagwan Singh Son Sh. Shree Lal, Village Gher,tehsil And District Dholpurraj. 3. Smt. Vimla Devi Widow Of Sh. Ashok Kumar,, Ashl Vihar Colony,bag Patiala, Kothi Dholpur, District Dhopurraj. 4. Mukesh Son Of Sh. Sovern Singh, Village Thekuli, Tehsil Sepau,district Dholpurraj 5. Munna Lal Son Of Sh. Madan Singh, Village Basai Dang,tehsil Bari,district Dholpurraj. 6. Radhey Shyam Meena Son Of Shri Ram Kripal,sub- Registrar,near Gulab Bag,dholpurraj. ----Respondents Connected With S.B. Civil Writ Petition No. 10416/2008 1. Sarnam Singh Son of Sh. Shree Lal, aged about 40 years, Resident of Village Gher, Tehsil &B District Dholpur (Raj.) ----Petitioner Versus 1. Additional District Judge Fast Track No. 1, Dholpur Raj. 2. Bhagwan Singh Son Sh. Shree Lal, Village Gher,tehsil And District Dholpurraj. 3. Smt. Vimla Devi Widow Of Sh. Ashok Kumar,, Ashl Vihar Colony,bag Patiala, Kothi Dholpur, District Dhopurraj. 4. Mukesh Son Of Sh. Sovern Singh, Village Thekuli, Tehsil Sepau,district Dholpurraj 5. Munna Lal Son Of Sh. Madan Singh, Village Basai Dang,tehsil Bari,district Dholpurraj. 6. Radhey Shyam Meena Son Of Shri Ram Kripal,sub- Registrar,near Gulab Bag,dholpurraj. [2025:RJ-JP:48575] (2 of 2) [CW-10413/2008] ----Respondent For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Rajkamal Gaur For Respondent(s) : Mr. Dinesh Kumar Garg HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE BIPIN GUPTA Order 28/11/2025 Learned counsel for the parties are in agreement that present writ petitions has become infructuous on account of the fact of settlement between the parties as well as dismissal of the suit itself. The writ petitions are dismissed as infructuous. Pending application(s), if any, stands disposed of. (BIPIN GUPTA),J Chandan/55-56