Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
APHC010104922020
IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3233] TUESDAY, THE TWENTY THIRD DAY OF SEPTEMBER TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE B KRISHNA MOHAN WRIT PETITION NO: 6437/2020 Between:
1. VEDULLA ANNAPURNA, W/O.SATYANARAYANA, AGED ABOUT 58 YEARS, R/O.2-51, RAMALAYAM STREET, NEAR HIGH SCHOOL, KRISHNAYAPALEM, TADEPALLIGUDEM MANDAL, WEST GODAVARI DISTRICT
...PETITIONER AND
1. THE STATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH, THROUGH ITS PRINCIPAL SECRETARY, DEPARTMENT OF REVENUE (ASSIGNMENT), SECRETARIAT, VELAGAPUDI, AMARAVATHI, GUNTUR DISTRICT.
2. THE DISTRICT COLLECTOR, WEST GODAVARI DISTRICT, ELURU.
3. THE REVENUE DIVISIONAL OFFICER, TADEPALLIGUDEM MANDAL WEST GODAVARI DISTRICT.
4. THE TAHSILDAR, TADEPALLIGUDEM MANDAL, WEST GODAVARI DISTRICT.
...RESPONDENT(S): Counsel for the Petitioner:
1. SAI GANGADHAR CHAMARTY Counsel for the Respondent(S):
1. GP FOR REVENUE (AP)
2 HBKM,J W.P.No.6437 of 2020
The Court made the following Order:
Heard the learned counsel for the petitioner and the learned Assistant Government Pleader for the respondents.
2. This writ petition was filed questioning the action of the respondents in trying to assign the house site pattas in 'Navaratnalu-Pedalandariki Illu' program in the land in R.S.Nos.6/1 and 6/2 of Krishnayapalem Village, Tadepalligudem Mandal, West Godavari District, which was classified as road without following the due process of law.
3. On the other hand, the learned Assistant Government Pleader relying upon the written instructions of the 4th respondent dated 22.09.2025 submits that the subject land is not utilized for the above said public purpose of housing and the petitioner’s land is adjacent to the proposed land for issuing house site pattas and as such there is no right for the petitioner.
4. In view of the above said facts and circumstances, as the subject land is not utilized for the above said purpose of housing under the welfare scheme, no further orders are necessary in this writ petition. However, the respondent Nos.2 to 4 are directed to deal with the subject land, strictly in accordance with law, if so warranted for any public purpose.
5. Accordingly, this Writ Petition is disposed of. Interim order if any deemed to have been vacated. There shall be no order as to costs. The
3 HBKM,J W.P.No.6437 of 2020
written instructions of the 4th respondent dated 22.09.2025 shall be made as part of the Court record.
As a sequel, Interlocutory Applications pending, if any, shall stand closed.
__________________________ JUSTICE B. KRISHNA MOHAN 23.09.2025 PGT