w IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH :: AMARAVATI FRIDAY ,THE SECOND DAY OF MAY TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT the honourable SRt JUSTICE TARLADA RAJASEKHAR CONTEMPT CASE NO: 3872 OF 9(\oa RAO Contempt Case filed under Sections 10 Act 1971, to punish the the Contempt of Courts Act implementation of the orders 16265 of 2015, dated 18.04.2024 to 12 of Contempt of Courts respondents/contemnors under Sec. 10 to 12 for wilful, deliberate, disobedience, passed by this Hon’ble Court, in W.P.No of non Between: Yeripelli Rambabu, S/o. Late Appanna, Aged 15-1-233, about 69 years, R/o. D.No. Colony, Shibbapalem Pedagantyada Mandal, Visakhapatnam-530 044 Rehabilitation Gangavaram ...PETITIONER AND Sri AtuI Butta, Working as Chairman-cum-Managing Director, RINL Visakhapatnam Steel Plant. Administrative Building 530 001. 2. Dr. S.K.Pandy, Working Steel Plant, Visakhapatnam-530 001. Visakhapatnam- Director (Personnel), RINL, Visakhapatnam as ...RESPONDENTS/CONTEMNORS Counsel for the Petitioner.SRI. Counsel for the Respondents: The Court made the following order: Y KANAKALINGESWARA RAO ■y < SRI KIRAN KUMAR VADLAMUDI '■r 5 i I nni - - . APHC010440532024 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) FRIDAY, THE SECOND DAY OF MAY TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE TARLADA RAJASEKHAR RAO CONTEMPT CASE NO: 3872/2024 [3330] Between: Yeripelli Rambabu ...PETITIONER AND ...CONTEMNOR(S) Sri AtuI Butta and another Counsel for the Petitioner: 1 .Y KANAKALINGESWARA RAO Counsel for the Contemnor(S): 1. KIRAN KUMAR VADLAMUDI The Court made the following: THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE TARLADA RAJASEKHAR RAO CONTEMPT CASE N0.3872 of 2024 ORDER: ♦f' Learned counsel for the respondents would submit that the order, dated 18.04.2024 of this Court passed in W.P.No.16265 of 2015 has been complied with by the respondents. On earlier occasion also, learned counsel represented the same and as there is no representation for the petitioner, this Court directed to list the matter under caption ‘for dismissal’. Despite the matter listed under the caption ‘for dismissal’, there is no representation for the petitioner today also. Therefore, the Contempt Case is dismissed for non-prosecution. There shall be no order as to costs. As a sequel thereto, miscellaneous Petitions pending, if any. shall stand closed. \ Sd/- E KAMESWARA RAO JOINT REGISTRAR //TRUE COPY// SECTION OFFICER To 1. Sri AtuI Butta, Working as Chairman-cum-Managing Director, RINL, Visakhapatnam Steel Plant, Administrative Building, Visakhapatnam- 530 001. 2. Dr. S.K.Pandy, Working as Director (Personnel), RINL, Visakhapatnam Steel Plant, Visakhapatnam-530 001. 3. OneCCto SRI. Y KANAKALINGESWARA RAO, Advocate [OPUC] 4. One CC to SRI. KlRAN KUMAR VADLAMUD, Advocate [OPUC] 5. Three CD Copies - nm HIGH COURT DATED:02/05/2025 ORDER CC.No.3872 of 2024 ^ 2 0 AUG 2025 o itS«cti«vxV DISMISSING THE CONTEMPT CASE FOR NON-PROSECUTION