A.No. 4247 of 2025 in CS.No. 203 of 2022 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS DATED: 15-09-2025 CORAM THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE P. DHANABAL Application No. 4247 of 2025 in C.S.No. 203 of 2022 1.V.Sucharita 2.S.Radhika 3.N.Krishna Prabha ....Applicants/Plaintiffs Versus 1.N.Susheela Bai (Deceased) 2.H.H. Jayshree 3.Aruna 4.Sruthi 5.Roshan Anantharamakrishnan ...Respondents/defendants Prayer: Application is filed under Order XIV Rule 8 of Original Side Rules under Order VII Rule 14(3) of the Code of Civil Procedure, 1908 praying to the applicants/plaintiffs to receive additional documents 1 to 9 in the above suit. For Applicants : Mr.J.Pothiraj For RR2 to 4 : M/s.Madhupreetha Elango --- https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis A.No. 4247 of 2025 in CS.No. 203 of 2022 ORDER This Application has been filed by the applicants/plaintiffs under Order XIV Rule 8 of Original Side Rules under Order VII Rule 14(3) of the Code of Civil Procedure, 1908 praying to permit the applicants/plaintiffs to receive additional documents 1 to 9 in the above suit. 2. According to the applicants/plaintiffs, they are unable to produce the documents 1 to 9 at the time of filing the suit. The second plaintiff, viz., S.Radhika, is in Hyderabad. Since the applicants/plaintiffs left the documents inadvertently they were unable to produce the same at the time of filing the suit. As the aforesaid documents are in possession of 2nd plaintiff, the applicants/plaintiffs were unable to mark the documents. Therefore, the applicants filed this application along with the said documents. 3. The learned Counsel appearing for the respondents/defendants would submit that the applicants/plaintiffs have filed the above application only to drag on the proceedings. He would further submit that several times the case has been adjourned for cross examination of PW1 and marking of https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis A.No. 4247 of 2025 in CS.No. 203 of 2022 documents, but, the applicants failed to file those additional documents. Therefore, he strongly opposed for allowing this application. 4. Heard both sides and perused the records. 5. This application has been filed by the applicants/plaintiffs to receive the additional documents. Considering the reasons stated by the applicants/plaintiffs that those documents were under the custody of 2nd plaintiff who was in Hyderabad and inadvertently failed to produce the same, the said documents can be received subject to admissibility, relevancy and proof. The respondents/defendants can raise their objection at the time of marking the documents. 6. Accordingly, this application is allowed. No costs. 15.09.2025 MSM https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis A.No. 4247 of 2025 in CS.No. 203 of 2022 P. DHANABAL, J., MSM A,No. 4247 of 2025 in C.S,No. 203 of 2022 15.09.2025 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis