Sri P.V.Narayana Raju, v. The State of Andhra Pradesh,
WP/257/2025 · 2025-01-08
Subba Reddy Satti
body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 45532 (AP) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 45532 (AP) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
APHC010602652024
IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3331] WEDNESDAY, THE EIGHTEENTH DAY OF MARCH TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY SIX PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE SUBBA REDDY SATTI WRIT PETITION NO: 257/2025 Between: Sri P.v.narayana Raju, ...PETITIONER AND The State Of Andhra Pradesh and Others ...RESPONDENT(S) Counsel for the Petitioner:
1. SRINIVAS BASAVA Counsel for the Respondent(S):
1. GP FOR SERVICES II
2. M SIVA JYOTHI The Court made the following:
I.A.No.2 of 2025
This petition is filed seeking to condone the delay of 133 days in re- submitting the I.A.No.3 of 2025.
For the reasons mentioned in the affidavit, this petition is ordered as prayed for.
____________________________
SUBBA REDDY SATTI, J
I.A.No.3 of 2025 (On Being Mentioned)
This petition is filed seeking to list the matter under the caption For Being Mentioned.
Smt.M.Siva Jyothi, learned counsel for the petitioners would submit that in Paragraph-7 of the order it was noted as <3rd respondent vide Ref:KDDCB/HRD/DE/1/2024-25, dated 28.05.2024= instead of <2nd respondent vide Ref:KDDCB/HRD/Appeal/2024-25, dated 28.11.2024=.
Sri Srinivasa Basava, learned counsel for the writ petition did not oppose the application.
For the reasons mentioned in the affidavit, this petition is ordered. The words in Paragraph-7 of the
order <3rd respondent vide Ref:KDDCB/HRD/DE/1/2024-25, dated 28.05.2024= shall be replaced with <2nd respondent vide Ref:KDDCB/HRD/Appeal/2024-25, dated 28.11.2024=.
Registry is directed to carry out necessary amendments and issue fresh
order.
____________________________
SUBBA REDDY SATTI, J PVD