HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD SECOND APPEAL No. - 2346 of 1982 Court No. - 36 HON'BLE ROHIT RANJAN AGARWAL, J. 1. On 01.08.2025, notice was issued to both the appellant as well as respondents to engage another counsel. 2. Office report dated 09.10.2025 indicates that notice sent to appellant no.1/1, 1/2, 1/3, 1/6 and 1/7 has returned back with postal remarks "प्राप्तकतार् का सही पता नहीं चला। अतः वापस।". As far as notice on behalf of appellants no.1/4 and 1/5 is concerned, notice returned back with postal remarks "अपूणर् पता।". As far as notice on behalf of appellant no.1/8 is concerned, undelivered cover has not returned. 3. As far as notice on behalf respondent no.2 is concerned, office report indicates that respondent no.2 is no more, while respondent no.3, notice has returned back with postal remarks "प्राप्तकतार् बाहर रहते है। अतः वापस।" 4. In view of said office report, notice upon appellant is deemed sufficient. 5. As no one has put in appearance on behalf of appellant to press the appeal, the appeal stands dismissed for wants of prosecution. October 10, 2025 SK Goswami Versus Counsel for Appellant(s) : Prakash Krishan Counsel for Respondent(s) : C.P. Srivastava (Rohit Ranjan Agarwal,J.) Sia Ram .....Appellant(s) Jhinguri And Others .....Respondent(s) Digitally signed by :- SHIVAKANT GOSWAMI High Court of Judicature at Allahabad