Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Rajasthan · body

2025 DAILYLAW 45527 (RAJ)

LOKESH CHATURVEDI S/O BALVEER CHATURVEDI v. STATE OF RAJASTHAN

CRLMP/6181/2023 · 2025-11-24

Anoop Kumar Dhand

Transfer Petitionbody2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR S.B. Criminal Miscellaneous (Petition) No. 6181/2023 Lokesh Chaturvedi S/o Balveer Chaturvedi, R/o Village Kiratpura, Post Saypur, Tehsil And District Karauli (Rajasthan), Presently Residing At 69/287, V.t. Road, Mansarovar Jaipur. ----Petitioner Versus 1. State Of Rajasthan, Through Public Prosecutor 2. The Director General Of Police, Rajasthan, Jaipur 3. The Commissioner Of Police, Police Commissionerate, Govt. Hostel, M.i. Road, Jaipur. 4. The Special Crime And Cyber Crime Police Station, Com- missionerate, Jaipur, Deputy Commissioner Of Police, Commissionerate, Jaipur. ----Respondents For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Rajat Singh For Respondent(s) : Mr. Amit Punia-PP JUSTICE ANOOP KUMAR DHAND Order 24/11/2025 1. The instant misc. petition has been preferred by the peti- tioner seeking directions for fair, proper and impartial investigation in FIR No. 90/2023 registered with Special Crime and Cyber Crime Police Station, Commissionerate, Jaipur, Deputy Commissioner of Police, Crime Commissionerate, Jaipur. 2. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that an FIR was registered against the accused person on 14.08.2023, but the Po- lice is not proceeding in a fair and proper manner, so appropriate directions be issued to the Investigating Officer for conducting a fair and impartial investigation. (2 of 2) [CRLMP-6181/2023] 3. Per contra, learned Public Prosecutor opposes the prayer and submits that the matter is still at investigation stage and it will take its own time & motion, so directions sought for should not be granted. 4. Looking to the fact that the FIR has been registered in the month of August, 2023, this Court is of the view that the peti- tioner is at liberty to move an application under Section 200 Cr.P.C., in pursuance of the directions issued by the Hon’ble Apex Court in the case of Sakiri Vasu Vs. State Of U.P. And Others reported in 2008 (2) SCC 409, before the court concerned to get the status report of the investigation. 5. In case, any application, as mentioned above, is submitted by the petitioner before the trial court, appropriate orders shall be passed by the court concerned strictly in accordance with law. 6. With the aforesaid observations, the instant criminal misc. petition stands disposed of. (ANOOP KUMAR DHAND),J Ashu/4