Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
CRR-1078-2025(O&M) 1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH 118
CRR-1078-2025(O&M) Decided on:09.07.2025 Dheeraj Singh …...Petitioner Versus State of Haryana and another …...Respondent
CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SANJAY VASHISTH Present: Mr. Rajesh Thakur, Advocate for Mr. Sarfaraj Anjum Mor, Advocate for the petitioner.
**** SANJAY VASHISTH, J.
1. Present revision petition has been filed against the order dated 20.01.2025 passed by the learned Additional Sessions Judge, Gurugram, whereby it was held that a prima facie case under Sections 307, 324, and 326 of the Indian Penal Code is made out against the petitioner and also challenges the charge-sheet dated 20.01.2025, under which the petitioner has been charge-sheeted under the same sections.
2. As per the allegations in the FIR, Farsa blow was given on the head of the injured-complainant namely, Kishanpal . The blow was partly averted by the injured using his hands, resulting in injuries to the hands. A second attempt was also made to attack the complainant with the farsa. Whether there was any intention to kill is a matter to be determined by the learned trial court after recording the depositions of the complainant and eyewitnesses.
3. Upon careful consideration of the facts and submissions, this Court finds no substantial reason to interfere with the impugned order of charge or the charge-sheet. The determination of the intention behind the RASHMI 2025.07.10 10:47 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document
CRR-1078-2025(O&M) 2 alleged act and other material facts are questions of fact that are to be examined and decided by the trial court in due course. Accordingly, the present revision petition is dismissed. Pending miscellaneous application(s), if any, shall stand
disposed of accordingly.
(SANJAY VASHISTH) JUDGE July 09, 2025 rashmi Whether Speaking/Reasoned:YES/NO Whether Reportable: YES/NO RASHMI 2025.07.10 10:47 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document