Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Rajasthan · body

2025 DAILYLAW 45519 (RAJ)

SMT. YOGITA CHOUDHARY W/O SHRI NANU RAM CHOUDHARY D/O SHRI PADMA RAM v. STATE OF RAJASTHAN

CRLW/1674/2025 · 2025-12-17

Anil Kumar Upman

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

[2025:RJ-JP:51092] HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR S.B. Criminal Writ Petition No. 1674/2025 1. Smt. Yogita Choudhary W/o Shri Nanu Ram Choudhary D/o Shri Padma Ram, Aged About 19 Years, Resident of Dodwadiyo Ka Bas, Sinodiya Jaipur. At Resident of Bhukharon Ki Dhani, Jorpura, District Jaipur (Raj) 2. Nanu Ram Choudhary S/o Shri Bhanwar Lal Choudhary, Aged About 26 Years, Resident of-Bhukharon Ki Dhani, Jorpura, District Jaipur (Raj). ----Petitioners Versus 1. State of Rajasthan, through Home Secretary, Secretariat, Jaipur (Rajasthan). 2. The Commissioner of Police, Jaipur (Raj). 3. The Station House Officer (Nodal Officer) Police Station, Phulera, District- Jaipur. 4. The Superintendent of Police, District Jaipur (Raj). 5. Padma Ram S/o Shri Jivan Ram, Resident of Resident Dodwadiyo Ka Bas, Sinodiya, Jaipur. 6. Ramnarayan S/o Shri Ratan Lal, Resident Of Resident of Village Khatwari, Tehsil Phulera District Jaipur. 7. Vinod Choudhary S/o Shri Ganesh Choudhary, Resident of Resident of Village Balda Ki Dhani, Mundawada, Tehsil Phulera, District Jaipur. 8. Ramdhan Dodvadiya, Sarpanch Village Mundawada Tehsil Phulera, District Jaipur. ----Respondents For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Neeraj Sharma For Respondent(s) : Mr. M.S. Shekhawat, PP with Mr. Gaurav Gupta, Asstt. G.A. HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ANIL KUMAR UPMAN Order 17/12/2025 1. Defects pointed out by the registry are overruled. 2. Petitioners are major and present in person. They have duly been identified by their counsel. [2025:RJ-JP:51092] (2 of 3) [CRLW-1674/2025] 3. This criminal writ petition has been filed by petitioners seeking protection from the private respondent Nos.5 to 8 as they are apprehending danger to their life and liberty at the hands of private respondents. 4. Learned counsel for the petitioners submits that both the petitioners are mature enough to take decision of their life. He submits that petitioners have entered into marriage as per Hindu Rites and Customs at Arya Samaj Sansthan 201-202 Second Floor Apex Towar, Lal Kothi, Tonk Road, Jaipur and same has been registered before the Office of Marriage Registration Officer, Jaipur. The certificate of registration of marriage of the petitioners is annexed with this petition. Counsel further submits that petitioners are living peacefully as husband and wife but respondent Nos.5 to 8 are not happy with their marriage and petitioners are receiving continuous threats from the private respondents, so they prayed for protection. 5. In view of the above factual averments, petitioners are directed to file appropriate application seeking protection before respondent No.3-Station House Officer (Nodal Officer) Police Station, Phulera, District- Jaipur and respondent no.3 is directed to provide protection to the petitioners, if any application is filed before him and he would ensure that no harm is caused to the petitioners. 6. The Criminal Writ Petition is, accordingly, disposed of. 7. Stay application and pending application(s), if any, stand disposed of. [2025:RJ-JP:51092] (3 of 3) [CRLW-1674/2025] 8. However, it is made clear that this order will not affect the civil/ criminal proceedings, if any, in the present matter. (ANIL KUMAR UPMAN),J LALIT MOHAN /426