Research › Search › Judgment

Patna High Court · body

2025 DAILYLAW 45516 (PAT)

Naveen Yadav @ Sarvjit Kumar @ Navin Kumar @ Sarvjeet Kumar v. The State of Bihar

CR. MISC./34101/2025 · 2025-06-20

Smt Soni Shrivastava

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.34101 of 2025 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-128 Year-2024 Thana- Gurupa District- Gaya ====================================================== Naveen Yadav @ Sarvjit Kumar @ Navin Kumar @ Sarvjeet Kumar S/O Munni Yadav @ Mundrika Prasad @ Mundrika Yadav R/O Village- Sandesh- war, Police Station- Fatehpur, District Gaya ... ... Petitioner/s Versus The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance : For the Petitioner : Ms. Surabhi Nirmal, Advocate Mr. Aryan Singh, Advocate For the State : Mr. Ram Priya Sharan Singh, APP ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE JUSTICE SMT. SONI SHRIVASTAVA ORAL ORDER 2 20-06-2025 Heard Ms. Surabhi Nirmal, learned counsel for the pe- titioner and Mr. Ram Priya Sharan Singh, learned APP for the State. 2. The petitioner seeks bail in a case registered for the offence punishable under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise (Amendment) Act, 2022. 3. Perusal of the first information report and the seizure list would go to show that 1400 liters of country made liquor is said to have been recovered from eight motorcycles. 4. It is submitted by learned counsel for the petitioner that there is no recovery from the conscious or physical posses- sion of the petitioner. The petitioner in his petition has stated that out of eight motorcycles standing in the forest, the peti- Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.34101 of 2025(2) dt.20-06-2025 2/2 tioner is neither the owner nor the driver of any of the motorcy- cles in question. The petitioner has been implicated in this case only on account of his criminal antecedent. Learned counsel for the petitioner points out that the petitioner had been granted an- ticipatory bail on merit by this Court on 02.04.2025 passed in Cr. Misc. No.17272 of 2025, Annexure-P/1 to this application, but the petitioner by that time was already apprehended and taken into custody on 24.03.2025. 5. Taking into consideration the fact and circumstances of the case as well as the fact that the petitioner had already been granted privilege of anticipatory bail on merits by this Court, the above named petitioner is directed to be enlarged on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs.10,000/- (Rupees Ten Thou- sand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfac- tion of the learned Court below where the case is pending/suc- cessor Court in connection with Gurpa P.S. Case No. 128 of 2024. Trivedi/- (Soni Shrivastava, J) U T