2025:JHHC:19304 1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI W.P.(C) No.420 of 2024 ----- Chandan Singh, son of Santlal Singh, Resident of Q. No.55/7, Railway Traffic Colony, Near Shiv Mandir, P.O.-Tata Nagar, P.S. Bagbera, Jamshedpur, District-East Singhbhum, Jharkhand. .......... Petitioner. -Versus- 1. The State of Jharkhand. 2. The Deputy Commissioner-cum-District Magistrate, East Singhbhum, Jamshedpur. 3. The Superintendent of Police, Jamshedpur. 4. The Sub-Divisional Officer, Dhalbhum, Jamshedpur. 5. The Circle Officer, Potka, East Singhbhum, Jharkhand. 6. The Debts Recovery Tribunal through its Registrar, RRDA Building, Kutchery Chowk, Ranchi. 7. The Central Bank of India through its Branch Manager, Jugsalari, East Singhbhum. 8. The Branch Manager, Central Bank of India, Jugsalai, Jamshedpur, East Singhbhum, Jharkhand. 9. M/s. Maxama India Inc. (Partnership Firm) represented through its Partner Jagdish Chandra Kaibarta office at Tarun Apartment, Holding No.1/4, 1st Floor, Dimna Road, P.O. & P.S. Mango, Jamshedpur, District East Singhbhum, Jharkhand. 10. Pramod Kumar Das son of Late C.N. Das, Resident of Holding No.318, Zone No.5, Near Kali Mandir, Birsa Nagar, P.O. & P.S. Birsa Nagar, Jamshedpur, East Singhbhum, Jharkhand. 11. Maheshwar Prasad Shukla, son of Sri Raghunath Shukla, Resident of 19 HM Colony, Road No.17, Jawahar Nagar, P.O. & P.S. Mango, Town-Jamshedpur, District East Singhbhum. 12. Jagdish Chandra Kaibarta, son of Kedar Kaibarta, Resident of H. Road, Adityapur Basti, P.O. & P.S. Adityapur, District- Seraikela Kharsawan, Jharkhand .......... Respondents. ----- CORAM : HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE RAJESH SHANKAR ----- For the Petitioner : Mr. Afaque Rashidi, Advocate For the State : Ms. Omiya Anusha, AC to AAG-IA For the Res.-Bank : Mr. P.A.S. Pati, Advocate ----- Order No.09 Date: 16.07.2025 1. The present writ petition has been filed for issuance of direction upon the Deputy Commissioner, East Singhbhum, Jamshedpur (the respondent no.2) to act in terms with the 2025:JHHC:19304 2 order dated 8th September, 2022 passed by the Debts Recovery Tribunal, Ranchi in R.C. No.137 of 2013 and to make an arrangement to hand over physical possession of the sold land to the petitioner. 2. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the possession of the property in question has already been handed over to the petitioner by the respondent-Bank. 3. Considering the said submission, there is no need to proceed further in the present matter. 4. The present writ petition is, accordingly, disposed of. (Rajesh Shankar, J.) Rohit/