Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Chhattisgarh · body

2025 DAILYLAW 45505 (CHH)

ASHOK SONKAR v. STATE OF CHHATTISGARH

WPCR/488/2024 · 2025-01-09

Shri Ravindra Kumar Agrawal

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

1 2025:CGHC:1343-DB NAFR HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR WPCR No. 488 of 2024 Ashok Sonkar S/o Fekuram Sonkar Aged About 56 Years Satipara, Ambikapur, District Surguja, Chhattisgarh. ... Petitioner(s) versus 1 - State Of Chhattisgarh Through The Collector, Ambikapur, District Surguja, Chhattisgarh. 2 - Chief Executive Officer Janpad Panchayat, Batauli, District Surguja, Chhattisgarh. 3 - Officer In Charge P.S.- Batauli, District Surguja, Chhattisgarh. ... Respondent(s) For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Anuj Kumar Pandey, Advocate For Respondent(s) : Mr. S.S. Baghel, Panel Lawyer Hon'ble Shri Ramesh Sinha, Chief Justice Hon'ble Shri Ravindra Kumar Agrawal , Judge Judgment on Board Per Ramesh Sinha, Chief Justice 09.01.2025 1. Heard Mr. Anuj Kumar Pandey, learned counsel for the petitioner. Also heard Mr. S.S. Baghel, learned Panel Lawyer for the MANPREET KAUR Digitally signed by MANPREET KAUR Date: 2025.01.10 14:47:05 +0530 2 respondents / State. 2. The petitioner has filed this petition praying for following relief:- “10.1 That, this Hon'ble Court may kindly be pleased to call for records for the kind perusal of the case. 10.2 That, this Hon'ble Court may kindly be pleased to direct the respondents to cancel their action regarding to lodging the FIR and also direct to do not disturb the service of the petitioner. in the interest of the Justice. 10.3 Any other relief which may be suitable in the facts and circumstance of the case, may also be granted. An affidavit is filed herewith in the support of this petition.” 3. Learned counsel for the petitioner seeks to withdraw this present petition with liberty to file afresh with a proper prayer and pleading before the appropriate forum. 4. In view of the same, this petition is dismissed as withdrawn, with liberty to file afresh with appropriate prayer and pleadings, before appropriate forum. 5. Certified copy of the documents annexed in the petition, if any, may be returned back to the counsel for the petitioner after obtaining the photocopy of the same. Sd/- Sd/- (Ravindra Kumar Agrawal) (Ramesh Sinha) Judge Chief Justice Manpreet