Neutral Citation No. - 2025:AHC:119600 Court No. - 70 Case :- CRIMINAL MISC. BAIL APPLICATION No. - 13544 of 2025 Applicant :- Anjar And Another Opposite Party :- State of U.P. Counsel for Applicant :- Santosh Kumar Singh Counsel for Opposite Party :- Ashok Kumar Singh Bais,G.A. Hon'ble Dr. Gautam Chowdhary,J. 1. Shri Sudhir Kumar Singh, has filed his memo of appearance on behalf of applicant-Anjar, which is taken on record. 2. Heard Shri Santosh Kumar Singh and Shri Sudhir Kumar Singh, learned counsel for the applicants, learned A.G.A. for the State and perused the material brought on record. 3. Learned counsel for the applicants submits that applicants are named along with three other persons and one unknown person. Allegation made is that all the accused assaulted the informant and some other persons with lathi-danda and sharp edged weapons. General allegations have been made against all the accused an no specific role has been assigned to the applicants. Two other co- accused namely Mahtab and Shahbaz, who were also named in the F.I.R. have already been enlarged on bail and as the case of applicants is not on the worse footing than that of the aforesaid two co- accused, therefore, applicants may also be enlarged on bail. Several other submissions in order to demonstrate the falsity of the allegations made against the applicants have also been placed before the Court. The circumstances which, according to the counsel, led to the false implication of the accused have also been mentioned. It has also been assured on behalf of the applicants that they are ready to cooperate with the process of law and shall faithfully make themselves available before the court whenever required and are also ready to accept all the conditions which the Court may deem fit to impose upon them. He next submits that there is one case against the applicant in which final report has already been forwarded. The applicants are languishing in jail since 05.03.2025. 4. Per contra, learned A.G.A. has opposed the prayer for bail of the applicants by contending that the innocence of the applicant cannot be adjudged at pre trial stage, therefore, they do not deserve any indulgence. 5. Considering the overall facts and circumstances, the nature of allegations, the gravity of offence and without expressing any opinion on merits, this Court finds it to be a fit case for bail. Accordingly, the bail application stands allowed. 6. Let the applicants-Anjar and Farman, be enlarged on bail in Case Crime No. 108 of 2025, under Sections 191(2), 333, 109(1), 352, 115(2), 131 of B.N.S., Police Station- Deoband, District- Saharanpur, on executing a personal bond each and furnishing two local sureties each in the like amount to the satisfaction of the court concerned with the following conditions: i) The applicants shall not tamper with the prosecution evidence. ii) The applicants shall not threaten or harass the prosecution witnesses. iii) The applicant shall appear on the date fixed by the trial court. iv) The applicants shall not commit any offence similar to the offence of which the applicant is accused, or suspected of the commission. v) The applicants shall not directly or indirectly make any inducement, threat or promise to any person acquainted with the facts of the case so as to dissuade such person from disclosing facts to the Court or to any police officer or tamper with the evidence. 7. In case of default of any of the conditions enumerated above, the court concerned shall be at liberty to cancel the bail of applicants in accordance with law. Order Date :- 22.7.2025 Mustaqeem. Digitally signed by :- MOHD MUSTAQEEM KHAN High Court of Judicature at Allahabad