- 1 - HC-KAR NC: 2025:KHC:48591-DB WA No. 843 of 2025 IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 24TH DAY OF NOVEMBER, 2025 PRESENT THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE D K SINGH AND THE HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE TARA VITASTA GANJU WRIT APPEAL NO. 843 OF 2025 (BDA) BETWEEN: 1. SMT. SAROJINI WIFE OF SRI. KAMALAKAR R NAIK, AGED ABOUT 56 YEARS, RESIDING AT NO.1455, 12TH CROSS, 14TH MAIN, CHANDRA LAYOUT, 1ST STAGE, II PHASE, BENGALURU - 560 072. …APPELLANT (BY SRI. MANU R, ADVOCATE FOR SRI. S RAJENDRA., ADVOCATE) AND: 1. DR. NAZEER AHMED SINCE DEAD BY LR'S 1(a). SMT. SAAKIR UNNISA WIFE OF LATE DR. NAZEER AHMED AGED ABOUT 72 YEARS, 1(b). SRI. ASLAM PASHA SON OF LATE DR. NAZEER AHMED AGED ABOUT 54 YEARS, 1(c). SMT. FAHEEM UNNISA DAUGHTER OF LATE DR. NAZEER AHMED AGED ABOUT 51 YEARS, Digitally signed by VASANTHA KUMARY B K Location: HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA - 2 - HC-KAR NC: 2025:KHC:48591-DB WA No. 843 of 2025 1(d). SMT. MUBEEN UNNISA DAUGHTER OF LATE DR. NAZEER AHMED AGED ABOUT 50 YEARS, ALL ARE RESIDING AT NO.80, NEW NO.18, RANGANATHA COLONY, 2ND CROSS, CHAMRAJPET MAIN ROAD, JJR NAGAR, BENGALURU - 560 018. 2. THE COMMISSIONER, BANGALORE DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY, KUMARA PARK WEST EXTENSION, SANKEY ROAD, BENGALURU - 560 020. …RESPONDENTS THIS WRIT APPEAL IS FILED U/S 4 OF THE KARNATAKA HIGH COURT ACT, 1961 READ WITH ARTICLES 226 AND 227 OF CONSTITUTION OF INDIA PRAYING TO ALLOW THIS WRIT APPEAL AND CONSEQUENTLY SET ASIDE THE ORDER DATED 27.02.2025, PASSED IN WP No. 8984/2018 PASSED BY THE LEARNED SINGLE JUDGE OF THE HON'BLE COURT AND ETC., THIS APPEAL, COMING ON FOR PRELIMINARY HEARING, THIS DAY, JUDGMENT WAS DELIVERED THEREIN AS UNDER: CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE D K SINGH and HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE TARA VITASTA GANJU - 3 - HC-KAR NC: 2025:KHC:48591-DB WA No. 843 of 2025 ORAL JUDGMENT (PER: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE D K SINGH) Learned counsel for the appellant has filed a memo dated 24.11.2025 seeking withdrawal of the appeal. The memo reads as under: "The undersigned counsel for the appellant seeks to withdraw the present appeal by seeking liberty to challenge the impugned order by way of review. The same may be taken on record in the interest of justice and equity." 2. In view of the memo, the writ appeal is dismissed as withdrawn with liberty as sought for. Sd/- (D K SINGH) JUDGE Sd/- (TARA VITASTA GANJU) JUDGE RKA List No.: 1 Sl No.: 2