SL. No. Date Office Notes, reports, orders or proceedings or directions and Registrar’s order with Signatures COURT’S OR JUDGE’S ORDERS 2025:UHC:8016 BAC No.11 of 2023 Hon’ble Ashish Naithani, J. Mr. Lalit Sharma, learned counsel for the Applicant. 2. Mr. S.R.S. Gill, learned counsel for the respondents. 3. State has sought cancellation of bail of the respondent (accused) granted in Case Crime No.289 of 2022 under Sections 420, 467, 468, 471, 34, 120- B IPC & Section 3, 4, 5, 9 & 10 of Uttar Pradesh Public Examinations (Prevention of Unfair Means) Act, 1998 Police Station Raipur District Dehradun. 4. Heard learned counsel for the parties and perused the record. 5. As soon as, the matter is taken up, the Court asked learned State Counsel, as to whether, similarly placed accused been already granted bail by this Court? The answer is in affirmative. 6. Learned State Counsel would submit that bail cancellation application had earlier been filed, but thereafter, similarly placed co-accused have already been granted bail by this Court and by the Hon’ble Supreme Court. 7. Since similarly placed accused have already been granted bail by this Court and by the Hon’ble Supreme Court, this Court does not see any reason to cancel the bail, granted to the applicant. 8. Having considered, this Court is of the view that the bail cancellation application deserves to be dismissed. 9. The bail cancellation application is dismissed. (Ashish Naithani, J.) 09.09.2025 Arti ARTI SINGH Digitally signed by ARTI SINGH DN: c=IN, o=HIGH COURT OF UTTARAKHAND, ou=HIGH COURT OF UTTARAKHAND, 2.5.4.20=487ed955e722ba65aab55409e686c12fb83a19325e8b66890fbee418e7b69c0d, postalCode=263001, st=UTTARAKHAND, serialNumber=26DC90E00D839E3E8714131F235087D2D87E133C57E7F4A7B2E734BE2521F982, cn=ARTI SINGH Date: 2025.09.11 17:13:33 +05'30'